Hi Ron, Message sent via GR. Also see attached file of Legacy warnings.
Cheers, Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: ronald ferguson To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 6:42 PM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Warning that genders wrong in marriages Bill, Please contact me through Genes and I will take a look for you. Please give me access to your tree and a couple of typical examples of individuals which are giving you problems. You should be able to find me by looking for a Jane Craison born 1766. (She may not be on the search list at present as I have only just added her). If you have a problem please contact me off list. Ron Ferguson _____________________________________________________________________ *New Tutorial* Create Standards Compliant CSS Pedigree web pages http://www.fergys.co.uk/ View the Grimshaw Family Tree at: http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _____________________________________________________________________ ________________________________ > From: tas...@bigpond.com > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: [LegacyUG] Warning that genders wrong in marriages > Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:27:21 +1000 > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just downloaded the free version to get a feel for > Legacy, as I want to select an app to stand alone on my computer to allow > reports etc and not rely entirely on a web site. Have my tree on the > GenesReunited web site in England. Started by importing the gedcom file into > Legacy and got an immediate page of warnings about wrong genders in marriages > (husbands recorded as female, wives as male). There are about 1700 > individuals on my tree so at a guess there are several hundred > marriages. There were about a dozen warnings of wrong gender. I've checked the > tree on GR, and no such errors. I've been through the Word file that is the > gedcom, and can't find any errors in the allocation of M or F. I've wondered > whether it's related to re-marriages, where a person has two or > more partners shown, and those partners are of course the same sex as each > other. Maybe Legacy thinks that each is the other's partner instead of both > being partners of somebody else? Can anybody advise what is wrong, please? Or is > nothing wrong, and I should just ignore the warnings? At this stage I haven't > gone any further - don't like the "try it and see if it seems to work" > approach. > > > > Bill Reynolds > > Australia > > > [http://gfx1.hotmail.com/mail/w3/ltr/i_safe.gif] > _________________________________________________________________ Share your photos with Windows Live Photos – Free. http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/134665338/direct/01/ Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Legacy error report for GR gedcom.doc
Description: MS-Word document
