Thanks Patti,
I think that what you suggested amounts to 1). W ca. 2K
Livings, would be tedious.
The idea behind 2) is that after each tagging op, the
number of only tagged on 1 would drop..would make the ops
slightly more efficient
J
-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree
Hi Folks,
How to do the above? 16K individuals, ca. 2K Livings.
1. Tag all Livings on 1. Select each Living one by one,
tag direct ancestors on 1. Export all tagged on 1.
After 2K operations, that would do it, but VERY tedious.
2. Do above, but after each selection tag FAMILY of
selected l
Does anyone understand why, only occasionally, during pedigree web page
construction, some are titled, e.g. 49.htm. 49b.htm? The number always
correspond to RIN's, but no RIN's are numbered 49b, etc.
Jonathan
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archi
Is there a quicker way?
To produce a relationship chart for 6 living individuals:
1. tag each individual's direct ancestor (i.e. six separate tag operations).
2. Tag all descendants of their most recent common ancestor.
3. Search for all individuals tagged in 1 & 2.
4. Export to new Legacy file or
There is no way within Legacy to produce that sort of list. In fact, I
don't think that, strictly speaking, you can do what Cary sugggested...
search and replace on the same string and note the source name, because
all Legacy shows you is the contents of the citation details field. You
can what Joh
And remember to put the date you accessed
the site in the “details” chunk of the citation. Websites change.
Jonathan
Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http
Title: Message
You
might consider the tradeoffs of serial vs. parallel processing, the former
being one laptop, many people, long wait, individuals horde it vs.
parallel--a simple family group paper sheet that you can hand out, they can take
it away and get it right, and hand it to you for d
I posted a day or so ago that no LUG messages had arrived since early
June (earthlink.net). Spam control is set so that only addresses in my
address book get through.
Adding LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com didn't work, but adding
the DOMAIN legacyfamilytree.com fixed the problem.
Not
Title: Earthlink.net also blocking LUG
To support.
Apparently earthlink.net also flummoxed by server changes. Not getting any LUG messages since ca. 6/13.
Jonathan
Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
To find past messages, p
9 matches
Mail list logo