Re: [LegacyUG] Another thought on children out of Wedlock

Toni I have no objection to the Mormon Church etc. being mentioned in context. But what is the relevance to this User Group? We are here to help one another use LEGACY FAMILY TREE SOFTWARE, not explain brick walls or search for missing data. Many recent discussions would be better on another Forum.

Re: [LegacyUG] Another thought on children out of Wedlock

sting ... therefore I care! Lighten up!!! Regards, Toni - Original Message - From: "Mary Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 5:52 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Another thought on children out of Wedlock Monogomy ... polygamy ... teachings of the Mor

Re: [LegacyUG] Another thought on children out of Wedlock

Monogomy ... polygamy ... teachings of the Mormon Church associated with the LDS (who cares?) ... aren't we getting off-topic again? Regards, Mary Young Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr

[LegacyUG] Another thought on children out of Wedlock

Here is another thought on children born out of wedlock and those "cassanovas" who seemingly left a trail of children via different women. Not everyone in the US practiced monogamy, this was especially true in the early 1800's. Although the LDS had its beginnings with a belief in polygamy, the chur