Spam (was RE: [LegacyUG] Bugs, Bugs and rush to be first.)

2008-09-12 Thread Sherry/Support
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael A. Palmieri Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 5:44 AM To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Bugs, Bugs and rush to be first.   Speaking of miffed, I am totally taken back by one of the leaders of Legacy's orga

Re: [LegacyUG] Bugs, Bugs and rush to be first.

2008-09-12 Thread Kathy Shiell-Stokes
It is nearly impossible to anticipate all the possible permutations of hardware and software conflicts that can result. Perhaps we should all take comfort in the idea that, at the end of the day, everyone who has spotted a bug or imperfection has contributed significantly to the improvement o

RE: [LegacyUG] Bugs, Bugs and rush to be first.

2008-09-12 Thread Michael A. Palmieri
ael A. Palmieri > Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:46:51 -0500> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Bugs, Bugs and > rush to be first.> > Michael A. Palmieri wrote:> > The user whose data is > mission critical sho

Re: [LegacyUG] Bugs, Bugs and rush to be first.

2008-09-12 Thread Bob
Michael A. Palmieri wrote: The user whose data is mission critical should at least sit out the first few releases if generating reports or building your cited sources list is mission critical. The folks at Millennia assured us repeatedly that we were sitting out the better part of a year's wort

[LegacyUG] Bugs, Bugs and rush to be first.

2008-09-12 Thread Michael A. Palmieri
Fellow Listers, I have been on the sidelines reading the banter concerning v.7 and am quite miffed with all the bashing. I also realize that the product should not have been released from Beta without more QC... that said. SourceWriter, reporting tools and the new charting application will pr