Roxanne wrote:
I personally don't. I have four databases: one for my own ancestors,
my half-sister's father, my ex-husband, and my youngest son's father.
It keeps me from getting bored, doing it this way. And the family
members who are interested in my progress are most emphatically NOT
intereste
ested in access to the
other lines.
Others do it differently, I know. It ultimately depends on what works best for
you.
Roxanne Baird
--- On Sat, 4/4/09, John Archer wrote:
> From: John Archer
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Dataset size
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Date: Sa
them.
After reading the article I will.
John
-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Geoff Rasmussen
Sent: Sunday, 5 April 2009 9:23 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Dataset size
Here's some
lto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of John Archer
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 1:42 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Dataset size
Should I put all my family history into one dataset regardless of how large
it might be?
Legacy User Group guidelines:
Should I put all my family history into one dataset regardless of how large
it might be?
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www
5 matches
Mail list logo