Re: [LegacyUG] Dataset size

2009-04-05 Thread Mike Fry
Roxanne wrote: I personally don't. I have four databases: one for my own ancestors, my half-sister's father, my ex-husband, and my youngest son's father. It keeps me from getting bored, doing it this way. And the family members who are interested in my progress are most emphatically NOT intereste

Re: [LegacyUG] Dataset size

2009-04-04 Thread Roxanne
ested in access to the other lines. Others do it differently, I know. It ultimately depends on what works best for you. Roxanne Baird --- On Sat, 4/4/09, John Archer wrote: > From: John Archer > Subject: [LegacyUG] Dataset size > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Date: Sa

RE: [LegacyUG] Dataset size

2009-04-04 Thread John Archer
them. After reading the article I will. John -Original Message- From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf Of Geoff Rasmussen Sent: Sunday, 5 April 2009 9:23 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Dataset size Here's some

RE: [LegacyUG] Dataset size

2009-04-04 Thread Geoff Rasmussen
lto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf Of John Archer Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 1:42 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Dataset size Should I put all my family history into one dataset regardless of how large it might be? Legacy User Group guidelines:

[LegacyUG] Dataset size

2009-04-04 Thread John Archer
Should I put all my family history into one dataset regardless of how large it might be? Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www