Re: [LegacyUG] FW: Source writer (Long Post)

2008-07-16 Thread Sharron Grover
Hi,   I don't want to get nit-picky, but the number in the left column on English census records from 1851 on is technically a schedule number.  A lot of people (including me until I was firmly corrected by my friend in England) mistake it for a house number, which most English houses didn't have.

RE: [LegacyUG] FW: Source writer (Long Post)

2008-07-16 Thread Phil Warn
Ron, Or sEMantics, either? Phil At 17:30 16/07/2008, ronald ferguson wrote: Ok, Jenny, I was never any good at symantics :-) Ron Ferguson Phil Warn ô¿ô Genealogists do it backwards Family Historians take all steps "The Warn family in Tetbury from 1722"

RE: [LegacyUG] FW: Source writer (Long Post)

2008-07-16 Thread ronald ferguson
Fergusons of N.W. England See: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _ > Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:19:10 +0100 > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] FW: Source write

RE: [LegacyUG] FW: Source writer (Long Post)

2008-07-16 Thread Don Brown
2008 3:13 AM > To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] FW: Source writer (Long Post) > > > Phil. > > PRO HO107 is included in the record by default, in the Details part of > the are boxes forFolio, Piece, Page and Individual ID (the latter being &

Re: [LegacyUG] FW: Source writer (Long Post)

2008-07-16 Thread Jenny M Benson
ronald ferguson wrote PRO HO107 is included in the record by default, in the Details part of the are boxes forFolio, Piece, Page and Individual ID (the latter being the number in the first column of the census, against each person). Small correction, Ron! There is no "Individual ID" on the s

Re: [LegacyUG] FW: Source writer (Long Post)

2008-07-16 Thread Jenny M Benson
Kirsten Bowman wrote The website creator is Ancestry.com (or perhaps you'd want to use The Generations Network). I use The Generations Network. Ancestry.com (or .com.au or .co.uk) is (part of) the URL. I don't see any point in the published date, but you might want to enter "accessed (dat

RE: [LegacyUG] FW: Source writer (Long Post)

2008-07-16 Thread ronald ferguson
/ _ > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] FW: Source writer (Long Post) > Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:43:34 -0700 > > Phil: > > It's actually much simpler than Anc

RE: [LegacyUG] FW: Source writer (Long Post)

2008-07-16 Thread Kirsten Bowman
c blurb. Kirsten -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Phil Hawkins Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 11:54 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] FW: Source writer (Long Post) Hi All Can someone show me how to write the s

RE: [LegacyUG] FW: Source writer (Long Post)

2008-07-16 Thread ronald ferguson
k/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _ > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: [LegacyUG] FW: Source writer (Long Post) > Date: Wed

[LegacyUG] FW: Source writer (Long Post)

2008-07-16 Thread Phil Hawkins
Hi All Can someone show me how to write the source information correctly into Source writer for, say the 1851 British census? When I look up info from ancestry.com.au, I am provided with source information such as attached. Source Citation: Class: HO107; Piece: 2364; Folio: 19; Page: 30; GSU ro