@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: 26 September 2009 15:46
Subject: [LegacyUG] Married name statement
How do I prevent the "Another name for Sarah was Sarah Smith" statement?
Her married name is given even though it isn't necessary since the statement
about her marriage is the next se
How do I prevent the "Another name for Sarah was Sarah Smith" statement?
Her married name is given even though it isn't necessary since the statement
about her marriage is the next sentence. I have searched help, but if the
solution is there, I didn't understand it.
Thanks for hints.
Jane Sarle
Jane Sarles wrote
How do I prevent the "Another name for Sarah was Sarah Smith"
statement? Her married name is given even though it isn't necessary
since the statement about her marriage is the next sentence. I have
searched help, but if the solution is there, I didn't understand it.
Have
7;m sorry you've run into this glitch.
Mary
- Original Message -
*From:* Jane Sarles <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To:* LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
<mailto:LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com>
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 01, 2008 8:48 AM
*Subject:* Re:
Jane wrote
I don't like the statement "Another name for X is XY." I would prefer
it to say: "Her married name is..." Or no statement at all, for I
fail to see the reason for the statement.
Jane, are you referring to married names that *you* have entered as
AKAs? Or is Legacy creating them auto
Mary
- Original Message -
From: Jane Sarles
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Married name statement
Dermot,
What can't be cured must be endured, and I will do so.
Thank you for clearing that up.
ly Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:37:23 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [L
lytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Married name statement
>
> But, when it is a married name, can I change the statement that appears
> in reports?
>
> Jane
>
>
> ronald ferguson wrote:
>> Jane,
>>
>> It need not be a married name and could be anything, an
mily Tree at:
>> http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
>> For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
>> http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
>> _
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Date: Mo
ree Contacts Database for use with Open Office
>>> http://www.fergys.co.uk
>>> View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
>>> http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
>>> For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
>>> http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
>>>
/
_
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:37:23 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Married name statement
I don't like the statement "Another name for X is XY." I would p
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:05:11 +0100, ronald ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>It need not be a married name and could be anything, and it may not be at all
>obvious. Users use AKAs for many different things and perhaps more than one.
Which points out a major shortcoming in the program ... the
; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Married name statement
>
>
> I don't like the statement "Another name for X is XY." I would prefer
> it to say: "Her married name is..." Or no statement at all, for
I don't like the statement "Another name for X is XY."I would prefer
it to say: "Her married name is..." Or no statement at all, for I
fail to see the reason for the statement. It seems self-evident, given
that her husband's name is in full view.
Is it possible to change this state
14 matches
Mail list logo
