Tks to all who replied. Clear but confusing. I'll obviously have to stop and
pause for thought before I go on. I did not think that there was so many
different ways of recording Census.
Back to the drawing board!
Kindest Regards, Richard Hallford.
Filing is easy, Retrieval is the hard part!
On 10
I didn't lose any either. In fact, one of the reasons that I switched
to Legacy was that the version of FTM I was using had a limited amount
of notes space. Sometimes I would have to continue a person's notes
into the notes area for his spouse.
Sara
On 10/12/07, John Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
ike the result.
Good luck!
Kirsten
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard
Hallford
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 5:56 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Master source vs events list
Im a little confused.
I didn't lose any notes going from FTM to Legacy. John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry &
Marilea Reinke
Sent: 12 October 2007 19:28
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Master source vs events l
When you switched from FTM to Legacy did you lose all your "notes" you had
recorded and obits? Thanks, Marilea
- Original Message -
From: "Sara Binkley Tarpley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ma
Sara, I also have for years put my census notes under general notes! I
have never used merge (Family Tree Maker) and have just recently purchased
Legacy. I don't mind at all doing this, as it helps me write very clearly
and put down notes, occupation, etc. John
Amen, Janis! The important th
Amen, Janis! The important thing is to know where that data came from
so that others can find it or you can find it again. At the risk of
having others shout, "Wrong, wrong, wrong!" I confess with fear and
trembling that I put my census transcriptions in the general notes
section and that I do no
Randolph:
The page number is from the actual Census roll, page, image:
Roll: T625_528, Page: 10B, ED: 50, Image: 0032
This is what Ancestry.com provides as their reference to the census image.
Chap
On 10/12/07, Randolph Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So the page number is the Ancestry a
I create a Master Source for the census. I am a splitter, so I often create
a Master source for one person's census. Many people, though, just create a
Master Source for 1900 Census, or 1900 Missouri Census or 1900 Howell County
Missouri Census. Whatever is in your comfort zone.
Personally, I foll
Richard Hallford wrote
But I just started putting in people, I got about 156 of them and now
have put in Census details. Before I go any further though, I think I
may have done it wrong, as its taking so long. The think is, Ive been
putting them in via the events. Should I be making Census info
So the page number is the Ancestry assigned number and not the HQ one?
On 10/12/07, Leon Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard:
> I create a Census event, but keep it fairly simple.
> Within the Census event, I use a Master Source for the Census record
> with all of the details.
> A couple
Richard:
I create a Census event, but keep it fairly simple.
Within the Census event, I use a Master Source for the Census record
with all of the details.
A couple examples of events and the associated sources is shown below:
EVENTS:
1. He appeared on the census on Jul 1, 1910 in Pleasant Val
Im a little confused. Im sure you guys all got this sorted out. But I just
started putting in people, I got about 156 of them and now have put in
Census details. Before I go any further though, I think I may have done it
wrong, as its taking so long. The think is, Ive been putting them in via the
e
13 matches
Mail list logo
