Re: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-18 Thread Tracy Skegg
hmmm, I use plain text, can't see why there would be gunk happening on my emails, curiouser and curiouser. Early Australian newspapers use text like "announcing the birth of a new child to Mr and Mrs John Smith", this is why I've added an AKA for Mrs John Smith for most of my pre-1960 married fema

Re: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-18 Thread Tracy Skegg
Just a quick note to Ron - when I finished the deed poll and it got formalised. I had to surrender my birth certificate and apply for the new one, looking back it seems funny. Pity I never thought back then of my later love for genealogy, I never kept copies of the old birth certificate. But my n

RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-18 Thread ronald ferguson
Fergusons of N.W. England See: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _ > Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:30:50 +1000 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] M

RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-18 Thread music-line
Choirmaster, Polesworth Abbey www.polesworthabbey.co.uk * -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tracy Skegg Sent: 18 June 2008 13:31 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re:

Re: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-18 Thread Tracy Skegg
Some of the emails here have discussed change of names. I've changed my name through deed poll and now I use my husband's surname. I've seen other family files where the surname is listed as "Jones Now Smith" or "Jones/Smith". Others have used birth names and add AKAs for all the names, as well

RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-18 Thread Steve
Benson Sent: Wednesday, 18 June 2008 9:09 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization) Jan Roberts wrote >my late first husband was born (say) John George SMITH, but by the time >I met him he had legally changed his name to Fred James

RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-18 Thread Jan Roberts
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization) Jan Roberts wrote >my late first husband was born (say) John George SMITH, but by the time >I met him he had legally changed his name to Fred James BROWN. I >became Mrs Jan BROWN when we married. Our daughter is Mary BROWN. S

Re: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-18 Thread Jenny M Benson
Jan Roberts wrote my late first husband was born (say) John George SMITH, but by the time I met him he had legally changed his name to Fred James BROWN. I became Mrs Jan BROWN when we married. Our daughter is Mary BROWN. So, although his parents are listed as Bill SMITH and Jane BROWN (he a

RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-18 Thread Jan Roberts
. Cheers, Jan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of music-line Sent: Wednesday, 18 June 2008 11:09:AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization) Hi Jan, Thank you so much for that. That&#

RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-17 Thread music-line
0:01 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization) I agree completely with your line of reasoning. With one exception - my late first husband was born (say) John George SMITH, but by the time I met him he had legally changed his name to Fred James BROWN. I

RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-17 Thread Jan Roberts
hange. Otherwise my daughter would show as Mary SMITH, which she has never been. Cheers, Jan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of music-line Sent: Tuesday, 17 June 2008 11:46:PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Mr

RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-17 Thread ronald ferguson
: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:59:29 -0400 > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization) > > ...and there is nothing more frustrating than an obituary that refers > to MRS JOE BLOW but make no mention of her

RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-17 Thread music-line
4 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization) David, The Title Suffix is useful when there are a series of repeated names. Some examples: Moses Sanders, Sr. Moses Sanders, Jr. Moses Sanders (child of Sr.'s son Aaron) I will probably recogniz

RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-17 Thread music-line
ergusons of N.W. England See: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _ > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization) > Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:45:34 +0100 > >

RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-17 Thread music-line
l Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sandra Black Sent: 17 June 2008 16:03 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization) I agree David. Well put. On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 7:45 AM, music-line <[EMAIL PROTE

RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-17 Thread music-line
asaweb.google.com/musicaldirector54 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wynthner Sent: 17 June 2008 16:44 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization) David, In doing royal genealogy it

Re: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-17 Thread Kathy Shiell-Stokes
...and there is nothing more frustrating than an obituary that refers to MRS JOE BLOW but make no mention of her given name! Kathy At 11:43 AM 6/17/2008, you wrote: ... If Mary Smith marries John Doe then upon marriage she becomes Mrs. John Doe and not Mary Doe. ... Legacy User Group guidel

RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-17 Thread John Carter
David, The Title Suffix is useful when there are a series of repeated names. Some examples: Moses Sanders, Sr. Moses Sanders, Jr. Moses Sanders (child of Sr.'s son Aaron) I will probably recognize which Moses is which by the spouse, children, and date/place but someone not familiar with the lin

Re: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-17 Thread Wynthner
une 17, 2008 8:45:34 AM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization) Hi Everyone, All this talk about whether we put full stops or not after Mr, Mrs, Miss, etc. had got me thinking about my own practice.  When I came to think, I realized that I do not actually record Mr, Mrs etc. at

Re: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-17 Thread Sandra Black
I agree David. Well put. On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 7:45 AM, music-line <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > All this talk about whether we put full stops or not after Mr, Mrs, Miss, > etc. had got me thinking about my own practice. When I came to think, I > realized that I do not actually

RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-17 Thread ronald ferguson
yweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _ > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization) > Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:45:34 +0100 > > Hi Everyone, > > All this talk about

RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-17 Thread Martin Briscoe
IL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of music-line > Sent: 17 June 2008 14:46 > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization) > > Hi Everyone, > > All this talk about whether we put full stops or n

RE: [LegacyUG] Mr & Mrs (was Standardization)

2008-06-17 Thread music-line
Hi Everyone, All this talk about whether we put full stops or not after Mr, Mrs, Miss, etc. had got me thinking about my own practice. When I came to think, I realized that I do not actually record Mr, Mrs etc. at all in the Individual's Information' view! Unless anyone can convince me otherwise