om
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Problem with Quarter dates
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 15:56:08 +0100
ronald ferguson wrote
The obvious answer is to check the "Exclude from Potential Problems" box
for that person.
I had thought of that, but wonder if this would exclude that individual's
rec
ronald ferguson wrote
The obvious answer is to check the "Exclude from Potential Problems"
box for that person.
I had thought of that, but wonder if this would exclude that
individual's record from *all* problems and thus I might miss out on
something else at a later time. (One of my favouri
Brian wrote
If your Legacy Build date is before 22 May 2006 then Legacy would
report the date as an error.
My Build Date is 30 May 2006, but now that you draw my attention to
those dates, I realise that 30 May was not very long ago and I wonder if
perhaps I have not had this problem since the
gacyFamilyTree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Problem with Quarter dates
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 21:39:17 +0100
Dennis M. Kowallek wrote
I just noticed in your example that the baptism is in 1851, while the
birth is in 1852. Maybe I don't understand Q dates, but I think this
should be flagged by
Jenny,
If your Legacy Build date is before 22 May 2006 then Legacy would report
the date as an error.
In the Build issued on May 22 the sorting of dates was changed. Before
that an incomplete date (Which a Quarter date is) was sorted to the
middle of the date range. Now we sort those to the
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 21:39:17 +0100, Jenny M Benson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Just to clarify: if I enter a Birth date of Dec Q 1851 and a Baptism
>date of 5 November 1851, Legacy tells me that the Baptism date is
>earlier than the Birth date.
It works fine for me. As a matter of fact, when I
Dennis M. Kowallek wrote
I just noticed in your example that the baptism is in 1851, while the
birth is in 1852. Maybe I don't understand Q dates, but I think this
should be flagged by Legacy as an error.
Whoops! That was a typo. I meant to use the same year.
Just to clarify: if I enter a
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006 18:50:54 +0100, Jenny M Benson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I use the Quarter date format a lot in my Family File (eg Dec Q 1852)
>but Legacy doesn't understand these in relation to "ordinary dates" (eg
>5 November 1851.)
I just noticed in your example that the baptism is in 1
Dennis M. Kowallek wrote
I can't duplicate this. Are you sure you have the latest update?
6.0.0.101. Is that the latest? I do update whenever Legacy prompts me.
--
Jenny M Benson
Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
To find past mes
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006 18:50:54 +0100, Jenny M Benson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I use the Quarter date format a lot in my Family File (eg Dec Q 1852)
>but Legacy doesn't understand these in relation to "ordinary dates" (eg
>5 November 1851.)
>
>If I enter the two example dates above as the Birth d
I use the Quarter date format a lot in my Family File (eg Dec Q 1852)
but Legacy doesn't understand these in relation to "ordinary dates" (eg
5 November 1851.)
If I enter the two example dates above as the Birth date (from GRO
index) and Baptism date (from IGI), I get an error message saying t
11 matches
Mail list logo
