Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Report output for child of spouseless relationship

2007-12-11 Thread Cathy
Hi Barbara, I think you are picking up the alternate wording for the "marriage". That's the type of wording I add for a relationship with unknown that resulted in a child. (Since this person isn't really unknown, perhaps they should be entered and marked private. Is the child growing up unawa

Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Report output for child of spouseless relationship

2007-12-10 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
How many generations is the report set to. Sounds like you have 2, you might want 3 or 4. Rich in LA CA --- Barbara Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now, in the report, it does have the right > order, but it now says each > spouse (no mention of children), and then at the > chronological point of t

RE: [LegacyUG] Re: Report output for child of spouseless relationship

2007-12-10 Thread M Couch
Barbara, just a hunch, make sure you have "include other spouses" checked under Report Options> Include -- Margaret -Original Message- On Behalf Of Barbara Ford Sent: Tuesday, 11 December 2007 1:24 p.m. For some reason my user group emails are not coming into my email account; however,

[LegacyUG] Re: Report output for child of spouseless relationship

2007-12-10 Thread Barbara Ford
For some reason my user group emails are not coming into my email account; however, on the archive list, I see that Clancy has responded with a suggestion. I did have the spouses in the wrong order, and so I changed that. Now, in the report, it does have the right order, but it now says each spouse