Valerie,
When we went from Version 5 to version 6, LUGers were asked to put the
VERSION they were asking about in the subject heading, so for example:
VER 6 Index question.
I hope we will all be good enough to remember to do this again.
Susan Daily
in Kansas City ;-)
On 5/14/08, Valerie Garton
I am wondering if it would be a good idea to have two separate mailing lists
when the new Legacy come out.
That is one for the main program and another one for charting queries. Just
trying to make a helpful suggestion.
Regards from Valerie in sunny Sydney.
Researching: BEDDY, CULLODEN, DYAS
Then, of course, you would need one for sourcing, one for mapping, etc.
A better idea might be one for gripes, one for constructive criticism and
one for Legacy itself.
Randy
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Valerie Garton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am wondering if it would be a good idea to
The thing that you are overlooking is that it costs real money to establish and maintain a list, not
to mention the time involved. Since this list is free for all to use the cost is transparent, and
therefor free, right?
--
Gene Y.
n2kvs
Researching Young, Zies, Harer Cox with
Legacy Family
Randolph Clark wrote
Then, of course, you would need one for sourcing, one for mapping, etc.
A better idea might be one for gripes, one for constructive criticism
and one for Legacy itself.
I think that would be going a bit too OTT, but Valerie has what sounds
like a good idea - one list for
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne af Jenny M
Benson
Sendt: 14. maj 2008 15:40
Til: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Emne: Re: [LegacyUG] to the powers that be
Randolph Clark wrote
Then, of course, you would need one for sourcing, one for mapping
Gene Young wrote:
The thing that you are overlooking is that it costs real money to
establish and maintain a list, not to mention the time involved. Since
this list is free for all to use the cost is transparent, and therefor
free, right?
Correct! The easiest way to run multiple lists
PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 10:37:09 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] to the powers that be
Gene Young wrote:
The thing that you are overlooking is that it costs real money to
establish and maintain a list, not to mention the time involved. Since
Wynthner wrote:
Mike,
No offense, but.
We can't keep posters from using :
1. Non-text (html, etc.),
2. Off Topic posts
3. Mail reciepts
etc.
Asking them to use prefixes to subject lines just might be a bit much...
I *do*, however, think it is a great idea!
vbg
I was going to post the
] On Behalf Of Mike Fry
Sent: Thursday, 15 May 2008 1:37 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] to the powers that be
Gene Young wrote:
The thing that you are overlooking is that it costs real money to
establish and maintain a list, not to mention the time involved. Since
I agree that we can't expect to make it universal, but if at least
some of us use this pattern, it might give others a pattern to follow
if they are inclined to.
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Gene Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wynthner wrote:
Mike,
No offense, but.
We can't keep
Wynthner wrote:
No offense, but.
We can't keep posters from using :
1. Non-text (html, etc.),
2. Off Topic posts
3. Mail reciepts
etc.
Asking them to use prefixes to subject lines just might be a bit much...
I *do*, however, think it is a great idea!
Yup! I know what you mean. It's
Using a prefix would be just like creating a focus group in your family file
by using the tagging numbers. What a great idea. I hope it catches on.
Bill Ellis
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Bruce Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that we can't expect to make it universal, but if at
13 matches
Mail list logo
