Re: [LegacyUG] Another (sorry) Source Query

2007-09-29 Thread Heather Stovold
If I'm importing stuff from a Gedcom from my dad, or from my mom I have the import automatically source it as from a Gedcom (and from whom) - and it puts it in the Unspecified. That is pretty much my only use although I think for a few live people that I know I have put a general "Personal K

Re: [LegacyUG] Another (sorry) Source Query

2007-09-29 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
NO. IMHO it is useless. Rich in LA CA --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Question for everyone... > Does anyone use the "Unspecified" line (it's the 1st > source reference) under > "Assigned Sources" for an individual??? > If you do ... for what purpose??? Is it necessary to > use??? > Thanks for

RE: [LegacyUG] Another (sorry) Source Query

2007-09-29 Thread Kirsten Bowman
Pami: It's not really *necessary* to use the field, it's apparently there for your convenience if you wish to use it--and I do frequently. One of my most common uses is to add a general note or comment that I hope will stand out in my posted GEDCOM. I have a Master Source called "NOTE." Using t

RE: [LegacyUG] Another (sorry) Source Query

2007-09-29 Thread ronald ferguson
] > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Another (sorry) Source Query > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Question for everyone... >> Does anyone use the "Unspecified" line (it's the 1st source reference) >> under "Assigned Sources"

Re: [LegacyUG] Another (sorry) Source Query

2007-09-29 Thread Robert Carneal USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Question for everyone... Does anyone use the "Unspecified" line (it's the 1st source reference) under "Assigned Sources" for an individual??? If you do ... for what purpose??? Is it necessary to use??? Thanks for your replies 'n happy hunting ... Pami Taylor Well, I d