Roxanne wrote:
I personally don't. I have four databases: one for my own ancestors,
my half-sister's father, my ex-husband, and my youngest son's father.
It keeps me from getting bored, doing it this way. And the family
members who are interested in my progress are most emphatically NOT
Here's some ideas from an article we published a while back:
http://legacynews.typepad.com/legacy_news/2006/03/your_legacy_dat.html
Thanks,
Geoff Rasmussen
Millennia Corporation
ge...@legacyfamilytree.com
www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com
them.
After reading the article I will.
John
-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Geoff Rasmussen
Sent: Sunday, 5 April 2009 9:23 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Dataset size
Here's some ideas
I personally don't. I have four databases: one for my own ancestors, my
half-sister's father, my ex-husband, and my youngest son's father. It keeps me
from getting bored, doing it this way. And the family members who are
interested in my progress are most emphatically NOT interested in access
4 matches
Mail list logo