Re: [LegacyUG] Married name statement

Jane, You have entered her married name in the AKAs and in whatever report your are using you have opted to show AKAs. It is your choice as to which you wish to change. Ron Ferguson _ New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website h

Re: [LegacyUG] Married name statement

Jane Sarles wrote How do I prevent the "Another name for Sarah was Sarah Smith"  statement?  Her married name is given even though it isn't necessary since the statement about her marriage is the next sentence.  I have searched help, but if the solution is there, I didn't understand it. Have

Re: [LegacyUG] Married name statement

7;m sorry you've run into this glitch. Mary - Original Message - *From:* Jane Sarles <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *To:* LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com <mailto:LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 01, 2008 8:48 AM *Subject:* Re:

Re: [LegacyUG] Married name statement

Jane wrote I don't like the statement "Another name for X is XY." I would prefer it to say: "Her married name is..." Or no statement at all, for I fail to see the reason for the statement. Jane, are you referring to married names that *you* have entered as AKAs? Or is Legacy creating them auto

Re: [LegacyUG] Married name statement

Mary - Original Message - From: Jane Sarles To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 8:48 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Married name statement Dermot, What can't be cured must be endured, and I will do so. Thank you for clearing that up.

Re: [LegacyUG] Married name statement

Dermot, What can't be cured must be endured, and I will do so. Thank you for clearing that up. Jane Dermot McGlone wrote: I think what Ronald and Dennis are talking about (and far be it for me to put words in their mouths!!) is that there is no way for Legacy to know that an AKA you have en

RE: [LegacyUG] Married name statement

lytree.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Married name statement > > But, when it is a married name, can I change the statement that appears > in reports? > > Jane > > > ronald ferguson wrote: >> Jane, >> >> It need not be a married name and could be anything, an

Re: [LegacyUG] Married name statement

I think what Ronald and Dennis are talking about (and far be it for me to put words in their mouths!!) is that there is no way for Legacy to know that an AKA you have entered for a particluar person is their married name, or is it just another name by which they are Also Known As. It would require

Re: [LegacyUG] Married name statement

By the way, before the pedants come chiming in, I meant to type "Far be it FROM me", but a slip of the keyboard mangled the phrase. Regards, Dermot. 2008/6/30 Dermot McGlone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I think what Ronald and Dennis are talking about (and far be it for me > to put words in their mout

Re: [LegacyUG] Married name statement

But, when it is a married name, can I change the statement that appears in reports? Jane ronald ferguson wrote: Jane, It need not be a married name and could be anything, and it may not be at all obvious. Users use AKAs for many different things and perhaps more than one. Ron Ferguson __

Re: [LegacyUG] Married name statement

On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:05:11 +0100, ronald ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >It need not be a married name and could be anything, and it may not be at all >obvious. Users use AKAs for many different things and perhaps more than one. Which points out a major shortcoming in the program ... the

RE: [LegacyUG] Married name statement

Jane, It need not be a married name and could be anything, and it may not be at all obvious. Users use AKAs for many different things and perhaps more than one. Ron Ferguson _ New Blog: Free Contacts Database for use with Op