I am weighing in a little late on this topic.
I use the new e-mail template exactly as it is, and am delighted with it. I
do source each e-mail separately, cutting and pasting the content into the
text tab.
I have made an exception in a case where I have had ongoing e-mail
discussion with
Thank you for your responses. It appears that, from these responses that
no-one is using the email template in the way it is designed. Although the
responses represent a relatively small sample of those using the programme,
the experience of people using the LUG leads me to believe that the
I also never use the Legacy SourceWriter templates.
It is certainly an option to group a collection of emails between two
people of which each is both the writer and recipient.
I do this myself, and I have also seen this sort of thing done in books
where a collection of correspondence between
Wynthner wrote
Wouldn't the easiest way be to just create another Master Source
Correspondence, Joe Bloggs-Fanny Adams
I could do that, and almost certainly would if I had several instances
of correspondence between 2 particular other people. Being a dedicated
lumper, it goes against my
I source my emails individually, but I rarely use emails as sources.
In the case of a long email exchange you could create one source for the entire
exchange. I don't see anything wrong with that. So long as you, and anyone
else, can find the sources later there should be no problem. Or use the
David,
I shouldn't think anybody uses that template as it was intended, I know I don't
and never will.
Apart from the Source name, believe it not, E-Mail the Master Source bit
contains only my name as the repository.
But it's in the detail that I really go to town, because here, in the
I don't use the Source Writer Templates at all, so far. But in my
sources I put a Master Source for each person whose email I keep. All
their individual emails are printed out in one continuous pdf. (To back
up: I send any email I'm keeping to EverNote using the EverNote clipper
button,
music-line wrote
I would value your advice on how to source emails. Is it the intention
of the programme writers for us to source each email individually?
Does anyone do this? In the source writer template for emails it gives
the impression that this should be the case, giving fields for the
Wouldn't the easiest way be to just create another Master Source
Correspondence, Joe Bloggs-Fanny Adams
--- On Sun, 11/23/08, Jenny M Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jenny M Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing emails
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:10:27 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing emails
--- On Sun, 11/23/08, Jenny M Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jenny M Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing emails
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Date: Sunday, November 23, 2008, 12:47 AM
music-line wrote
I would value your advice on how to source
11 matches
Mail list logo
