Jack,
I thought I could do something along these lines but was not sure how to do
it.
Many thanks!
Colin.
- Original Message -
From: j...@jearnshaw.me.uk
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 9:52 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Adoption Problem
Colin
I pre
kowal...@iglou.com wrote:
>> I am using Thunderbird on WinXP and have messages sorted by thread. The
>> messages from the new list address sort perfectly, under the correct OP
>> and in the correct order.
>
> I did not say that they wouldn't appear to sort correctly in any
> particular email client
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 12:22:32 -0500, geistdn...@cfl.rr.com wrote:
>Please note that the link to the archived messages needs to be updated as it
>is still sending you to messages archived on the old server with
>"legacyfamilytree.com" instead of "legacyusers.com".
Even after they change it, you may
Please note that the link to the archived messages needs to be updated as it
is still sending you to messages archived on the old server with
"legacyfamilytree.com" instead of "legacyusers.com".
Virginia
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived
>I am using Thunderbird on WinXP and have messages sorted by thread. The
>messages from the new list address sort perfectly, under the correct OP
>and in the correct order.
I did not say that they wouldn't appear to sort correctly in any
particular email client, especially with so few messages hav
kowal...@iglou.com wrote:
> I have noticed a potential message threading problem on the new Legacy
> mail server/mailing list...
>
> Message-ID
> --
>
> Legacy now appears to assign a unique Message-ID to every single email
> it sends out to the list users. The old server/list simply reused
I have noticed a potential message threading problem on the new Legacy
mail server/mailing list...
Message-ID
--
Legacy now appears to assign a unique Message-ID to every single email
it sends out to the list users. The old server/list simply reused the
incoming Message-ID that came with
Thank you, I missed that the LUG option was not checked. I see that they have
also now made it so that you have to confirm your subscription. This will
help to eliminate the folks who claim that they never subscribed to the list.
It will also prevent someone subscribing/unsubscribing someone
Sorry it's not a radio button but a selection box for the LUG the
Unsubscribe option is a radio button.
Evert
2009/12/5 Evert van Dijken :
> I've reported this before because the LUG option is *not* selected by
> default, the other two options are selected by default.
>
> So after filling in your
I've reported this before because the LUG option is *not* selected by
default, the other two options are selected by default.
So after filling in your e-mail address you have to select the radio
button for the Legacy User Group *and* select the unsubscribe option
before you hit Send Request.
Evert
Colin
I presume that you have this child as the son of the couple, hence the error
message. As he was born 3 yrs after the death of the husband then he never was
part of the relationship.
If you unlink the child from the parents and then select him as the current
person, link him back to just th
- Original Message -
From: mike...@iafrica.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 7:46 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Adoption Problem
cap...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
> I have just had two problems solved for me by one of the good people on
> this
> List and
I am testing to see if I was able to unsubscribe this address - have tried
twice since the user group came back on line.
--
Ron Bernier
Woonsocket, RI
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived
messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyus
cap...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
> I have just had two problems solved for me by one of the good people on this
> List and I now have another.
> I have a couple who married but did not have any children.
> The husband died in 1891 and the widow's unmarried sister gave birth to a
> boy three years lat
I have just had two problems solved for me by one of the good people on this
List and I now have another.
I have a couple who married but did not have any children.
The husband died in 1891 and the widow's unmarried sister gave birth to a
boy three years later. The widow took the baby in and raise
Margaret,
Thank you very much for this info, it will solve my problem nicely.
I could not see the wood for the trees.{;-)
There is no doubt about it, the help from this List is prompt and very much
appreciated!
Colin.
- Original Message -
From: mgroga...@gmail.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@lega
16 matches
Mail list logo
