Many of my relatives were living in Virginia, areas now West Virginia. In prior
software I used, the location could only be shown on a map if you gave the
state as West Virginia, historically incorrect. What are Legacy best practices
in this situation?
Bill
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 20, 2014,
The GEO database is a list of current locations...not time sensitive. The
county verifier can do some time sensitive lookup but it is not coordinated
with the GEO database. The Virtual Earth maps (now called the Bing Maps) are
not coordinated with the GEO database either. Those are 3 differen
Legacy Deluxe ver 7.5
I am no longer getting place locations exporting in a gedcom??
I am selecting
Export to Gedcom
File to : Legacy
Char: UTF8
check on Keep embedded
The resulting Gedcom contains no
0 _PLAC_DEFN
What could I have switched off?
I am not selecting any filters and when you re
>From 1778 to 1820 it was called the District of Maine.
FLR
Sent from my Netbook
- Original Message -
From: fers...@verizon.net
To: legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 6:55 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Geo-Locator Not Always Correct
I recently tried to inse
The county list isn't currently savvy enough to recognize the change in
state borders such as the one you stated. You just have to override it.
Consider it as nothing more than a suggestion anyway.
For a *very* accurate record of county border updates use the Atlas
of Historical County Boundary
I recently tried to insert a birthplace as Dixfield, Cumberland County,
Massachusetts only to be informed that there never was a Cumberland County in
Massachusetts. While it is is true that Cumberland County and Dixfield are in
Maine, the state of Maine did not come into existence until 1820.
Yvonne Morehouse
> On Jul 18, 2014, at 6:47 PM, "J.M. \"Jay\" Ingalls "
> wrote:
>
> Maureen,
>
> Can you send us a link (url) to an example so Ancestry members can see
> what you are asking about?
>
> Jay Ingalls
> ==
>> On 7/18/2014 11:59 AM, Maureen Lake wrote:
>> Go
I don’t think that they were ever coloured on the Family View, but would be
good if they were.
Susan
Oh, hang on - I think I'm having a senior moment! I see that the labels
ARE coloured on the Individual's Information screen. Did I just imagine
it that they used to be coloured on the Fam
On 20/07/2014 19:23, Mike Fry wrote:
>> I don't know when it happened, but I have just realised that the labels
>> >for fields with Sourced data were not showing in red text as they should
>> >be. I tried changing the selected colour and I tried changing the whole
>> >colour scheme (to the default
On 20 Jul 2014 19:44, Jenny M Benson wrote:
> I don't know when it happened, but I have just realised that the labels
> for fields with Sourced data were not showing in red text as they should
> be. I tried changing the selected colour and I tried changing the whole
> colour scheme (to the defaul
I don't know when it happened, but I have just realised that the labels
for fields with Sourced data were not showing in red text as they should
be. I tried changing the selected colour and I tried changing the whole
colour scheme (to the default) but nothing I do is causing the labels to
display
11 matches
Mail list logo
