I wondered why I received no posts; then figured it was Spring Break and
everyone was busy; then checked the archives and found there were posts, but
that I had received none of them!
So I posted this message which was returned with Legacy's message: "To:
wood...@msn.com
Subject: You do not h
They *are* the design team as well as management
Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Brian L. Lightfoot
wrote:
> I'm not advocating one side or the other to this potential programming change
> but I'm just curious as to why the change is up
I'm not advocating one side or the other to this potential programming change
but I'm just curious as to why the change is up to the programmers. You'd think
the design and direction of the software would be an executive decision or at
least coming from a management design team. Programmers usua
I agree wtih you John - the discussion was marriage. The person in my tree is
a cousin that would be highly offended if I called a "test tube" a
relationship.
From: John Lisle
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Any Way to
The discussion was reasons to split that question. The wording in Legacy is
"marriage" in that checkbox, not relationship. There was no marriage and there
was a child. If you want to take it a step further, I have a bunch that were
married but did not have children.
From: Jim Terry/Sup
It's already on the suggestion list. Whether or not the programmers
will change it back is up to them
Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Jim Terry/Support
wrote:
> John,
>
> You seem to have a lot of anxiety over this issue, to the point of
John,
You seem to have a lot of anxiety over this issue, to the point of having
hallucinations. If you want to submit this as a suggestion for an
enhancement to the Legacy program, please visit
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Suggest.asp. We are always seeking new ways
to make Legacy better.
Jim,
Dear Legacy Family Tree Webinar Subscribers - if you have Iowa ancestors,
you'll enjoy this brand new BONUS webinar (for webinar subscribers) from
Ruby Coleman. I loved it so much that I'll be writing an entire article
about how one of the topics Ruby spoke about helped to solve one of my
German br
JIm,
Sure... I do it all the time, but I was not talking about marriage status.
I was talking about the checkbox "This person was never married and
has no children" which is the subject of this thread.
I know that a user can decide that the word "married" in that
checkbox can mean whatever they
John,
Legacy users are free to create whatever Marriage Status they want and
create whatever wording options they want to handle the majority of the
most bizarre, unlikely relationships or non-relationships they can think
about.
Jim
Legacy Technical Support
Original Message
>
Jim,
I agree but...
I think that this most people think of this attribute of "Never
Married" as being no formal marriage event, not no relationships.
Further, even were it to mean No Relationships, unless we have
perfect knowledge of the person's life, we would have to say "No
KNOWN Relationship
In a case of in vitro fertilization there is a father and he is Unknown. We
haven't started cloning people yet, so for now there is still a biological
father and biological mother.
Jim
Legacy Technical Support
Original Message
> From: "MikeFry"
> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015
On 2015/04/07 00:19 AM, Kelly Booth wrote:
> I have a in vitro fertilization in my tree - she never married but I can't
> check
> that box because it includes "no children" and that is not the case.
That's still a "relationship". Even if the father is unknown, as is likely in
that case.
--
Rega
13 matches
Mail list logo
