/www.familysearch.org/library/books/records/item/494673-getting-it-right-the-definitive-guide-to-recording-family-history-accurately?offset=3
> >
> If the URL doesn't work, just search for it in FamilySearch books. The
> illustrations are all from Legacy.
>
> Cathy
>
>
&g
I am not certain how best to record royal names. For instance, if I am
adding King Edward II of England, do I place "King" in the Prefix space,
"Edward II" in given name, and "of England" in the surname space? I
assume consistency is probably the most important thing, showing all
royalty in the
Thank you so much to everyone who has responded to my query!!!
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 7:37 PM, CE WOOD wrote:
> The tradition of naming sons of kings "FitzRoy was a combination of the
> Welsh and French Norman - "fitz" = "son of in Welsh; "roi" = "king" in
> French. It was used by kings and the
rage*, *Domesday, Descendants*, *Domesday People*, *Europäische
> Stammtafeln*, and Settipani's tomes, have been corrected as new documents
> are being discovered all the time.
>
>
>
>
> CE
>
>
> --
> *From:* LegacyUserGroup on
I am fortunate in having success in documenting some of my family lines
back as far as the 13th century in what is now the UK. I would appreciate
suggestions as to the best way to record those names in my Legacy program.
Names such as the following are a bit different from today's nomenclature:
E
5 matches
Mail list logo
