Re: [LegacyUG] Duplicates

2020-02-12 Thread Roger Nordyke via LegacyUserGroup
I whole heartily agree with JTF. It is not that uncommon to have more than one child with the same name in the 17, 18, and early 1900's. One child might have died as an infant or at a very early age and the next child (son or daughter as the case might be) will be given the same name. Which some

Re: [LegacyUG] 1935

2020-01-14 Thread Roger Nordyke via LegacyUserGroup
One other to look out for on that 1935 - Same Place entry. Double check the date of birth of the individual, some census forms will indicate "Same Place" when that person wasn't even born then.  They might have been born in 1935, but after 1 Apr. I have come across that several times. Roger Nord

Re: [LegacyUG] 1935

2020-01-14 Thread Roger Nordyke via LegacyUserGroup
Hi Trevor,The other responses you have received about 1935 are correct. What I do, is in the Event/Fact: I make it "Residence", Date: 1 Apr 1935 (that being the date they are asking about, and the official date of the 1940 census), Place: I enter the same location that is shown on the 1940 censu

Re: [LegacyUG] Family search

2020-01-09 Thread Roger Nordyke via LegacyUserGroup
Are the children still alive? Is it your tree - are you the person that put them there? If the children are still alive and you are NOT the owner, then Family Search will NOT display them.  They will not display information on any living person unless you are the person that inputted that inform

Re: [LegacyUG] Problem adjusting size of screen.

2018-08-22 Thread Roger Nordyke via LegacyUserGroup
The original message to the list is in the attachment. This action is required because of the DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy imposed by some email providers. Users who want to send messages without conversion to attachments should use a different email address for their subscription. Known provid