ticulated to further qualify the selection of relationships based on
'strength'.)
Ward
- Original Message -
From: "Sherry/Support"
To:
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Half Cousins
Father > Grandfather > Great-grandfather, etc.
On 2010/11/02 10:12, roy_delos_re...@comcast.net wrote:
> Remember -16 ounces equals one pound,except, of course, when speaking of
> precious metals; in that field a pound equals 12 ounces.
Accuracy is everything! You're talking about two different systems of weight:
avoirdupois and troy. Wiki wou
that field a pound equals 12 ounces.
- Original Message -
From: "Ward Walker"
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Monday, November 1, 2010 6:04:26 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Half Cousins
And once again, I agree with Jennie. :-) I don't agree with the Eastman
blog. If
Father > Grandfather > Great-grandfather, etc.
Aunts, uncles, cousins, etc are not your direct line.
It's explained in the Legacy Help file under Set > Relatonships
Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Ward Walker wrote:
> Hmm. I'm not sure w
her the aunt or the uncle, not
both. Rather, the issue is whether the first cousins share one grandparent
or two.
Ward
- Original Message -
From: "Jenny M Benson"
To:
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 6:56 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Half Cousins
On 01/11/2010 10:37, D MG wro
art of the criteria.)
Ward
- Original Message -
From: "Sherry/Support"
To:
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Half Cousins
Actually, if you go to Tools > Set Relationships, you'll see the options
under
When displaying the default relationshi
Actually, if you go to Tools > Set Relationships, you'll see the options under
When displaying the default relationship term:
Show the closest relationshipo
Show the closest direct-line relationship (if any)
If you're not seeing the closest direct-line relationship when that
option is selected,
Ah Garl, do check the archives on this one. It is definitely a programming
problem. The program is set to display the CLOSEST relationship rather than
the closest DIRECT relationship. Many have tried to get this changed.
CE
On 30 October 2010 18:25, Garl Satterthwaite wrote:
Ward
You got
On 01/11/2010 10:37, D MG wrote:
> So according to this, Legacy is wrong using half-cousin labels, these
> people should be cousins, not half-cousins.
I haven't been following the ins and outs closely enough to know if
Legacy is wrong *in this case* but I don't think it would be wrong in
every c
> direct relationship should take priority over the half relationship. It must
> be a programming problem.
>
> Thanks, Garl
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ward Walker [mailto:wnkwal...@rogers.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 8:40 AM
> To: LegacyUserGroup
8:40 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Half Cousins
Are you referring to the Relationship Calculator? And the new scenario is
that an uncle of yours marries a half aunt of yours? And they are not half
siblings of each other? I tested this -- marrying an uncle on my
unt's child is your half first cousin. It is the same child,
but you are related to it in two ways.
Ward
- Original Message -
From: "Garl Satterthwaite"
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 1:03 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Half Cousins
Ward
It is little hard to duplica
".
--- On Sat, 10/30/10, Mary Young wrote:
From: Mary Young
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Half Cousins
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Date: Saturday, October 30, 2010, 4:27 AM
On 29 October 2010 19:19, Robert E. Carneal
wrote:
> The way the genealogists in my family used "married-i
On 29 October 2010 19:19, Robert E. Carneal
wrote:
> The way the genealogists in my family used "married-in" would be to
> refer to your siblings spouses. Example: You husband's name is John.
> Then:
> 1> John's sister's husband would be a "married in."
> 2> John's brother's wife would be a "ma
complex for
even the most sophisticated software.
John S. Adams
Hermosa Beach, CA
--
From: "Garl Satterthwaite"
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 10:03 PM
To:
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Half Cousins
> Ward
>
> It is little hard to du
[mailto:wnkwal...@rogers.com]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 2:20 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Half Cousins
Garl,
I'm afraid I don't see the problem. Two half first cousins share one common
grandparent (instead of two). Their children are then half second cousins.
inal Message -
From: "Robert E. Carneal"
To:
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Half Cousins
When I enter "halfsies," or "in-laws," or "married-ins," I get pretty
unsure of myself when I manually try to determine relationships.
L
The way the genealogists in my family used "married-in" would be to
refer to your siblings spouses. Example: You husband's name is John.
Then:
1> John's sister's husband would be a "married in."
2> John's brother's wife would be a "married in."
I -thought- that was common term. Maybe just my fa
On 29 October 2010 18:29, Robert E. Carneal
wrote:
> "married-in." Does anyone have a good cheat sheet defining these
> relationships clearly?
What is "married-in"?
Mary Young
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
When I enter "halfsies," or "in-laws," or "married-ins," I get pretty
unsure of myself when I manually try to determine relationships.
Legacy has a wonderful relationship chart that I use a lot, but not
really all that helpful when it comes to "step" "half" "in-law" or
"married-in." Does anyone ha
I find when an uncle marries a half cousin the half cousin label is passed
to the descendents in Legacy. The same is true whenever a any cousin marries
a half cousin. This does not seem to be correct.
Garl Satterthwaite
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etique
21 matches
Mail list logo
