Re: [LegacyUG] Potential Problem Report

2022-07-17 Thread Douglas James Tighe
Thanks so much for this detailed information. Douglas On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 15:16, Cathy Pinner wrote: > Douglas, > PP = Potential Problem - the subject of this thread. > > Tag is a way to group people in Legacy. There are 9 tags. You can see > the tag boxes on Family View if you turn them on a

Re: [LegacyUG] Potential Problem Report

2022-07-16 Thread Cathy Pinner
Douglas, PP = Potential Problem - the subject of this thread. Tag is a way to group people in Legacy. There are 9 tags. You can see the tag boxes on Family View if you turn them on at Options > Customise 1.5 There are also Hashtags in Legacy 9 as 9 tags were never enough. I now use Hashtags fo

Re: [LegacyUG] Potential Problem Report

2022-07-16 Thread Douglas James Tighe
Hi Cathy, Excuse my ignorance, but what is a tag and also PP. Doug On Sat, 16 Jul 2022 at 16:56, Cathy Pinner wrote: > Yes Ian, > Look at each tab and you'll find you can tag people with a PP. > You may want to adjust the criteria and so tag only people with the same > issue. > Once checked, you

Re: [LegacyUG] Potential Problem Report

2022-07-15 Thread Cathy Pinner
Yes Ian, Look at each tab and you'll find you can tag people with a PP. You may want to adjust the criteria and so tag only people with the same issue. Once checked, you can also mark as not a problem but beware those with mother older than 50 - the child may be the child of an unmarried daughte

[LegacyUG] Potential Problem Report

2022-07-15 Thread Ian Thomas
Potential Problems Report (under Tools) I have found a large number of records with a problem, some as obvious as "Birth Date after Death Date." = my typos, but many are "Birth Date after Mother is 50 years old." - which I believe have correct dates and persons (parents/children). Is there a m

Re: [LegacyUG] Potential Problem Report - Illegal Characters

2014-01-31 Thread Ila Johnson
HTML before using it in Legacy.  Ila Johnson From: MikeFry To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:42 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Potential Problem Report - Illegal Characters On 30 Jan 2014 00:38, Dave Naylor wrote: > On

Re: [LegacyUG] Potential Problem Report - Illegal Characters

2014-01-29 Thread Syble Glasscock
Thanks  I'll add "and" between the two surname variations.   I do like the Potential Problem report, but have had to "change" a few of my ways of entry.   Personally I like to immediately view the variations rather than use the aka. Ron, hope you're doing well. Syble On Wednesday, January 29

RE: [LegacyUG] Potential Problem Report - Illegal Characters

2014-01-29 Thread Brian L. Lightfoot
You are the only person in the group that does NOT need to see an optometrist. J Brian in CA Yeah, I didn’t see it either. From: Dee Ziegler [mailto:dee.zieg...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 3:06 PM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Potential

Re: [LegacyUG] Potential Problem Report - Illegal Characters

2014-01-29 Thread Dee Ziegler
In the illegal characters I see \/ -- backward slash, forward slash -- though the combination looks very much like a capital V (the letter). Dee in Maryland On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Larry Lee wrote: > It appears to me that she has the forward slash "/" not the vertical bar > "|". >

Re: [LegacyUG] Potential Problem Report - Illegal Characters

2014-01-29 Thread Larry Lee
It appears to me that she has the forward slash "/" not the vertical bar "|". What would happen if you put the second name in ( ) s? I don't see them in the forbidden character list. Larry Lee Sent from my Nook On Jan 29, 2014 3:43 PM, "MikeFry" wrote: > On 30 Jan 2014 00:38, Dave Naylor wrote:

RE: [LegacyUG] Potential Problem Report - Illegal Characters

2014-01-29 Thread Ron Ferguson
Syble, I have Hayes and Heyes and use the AKA. It is the only way which I know that is suitable and problem free. Additionally one can also search on that field. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ Syble Glasscock wrote: ># 6714, I have surname as Coffee/Cofey > #6706, I have Hays/Hayes >

Re: [LegacyUG] Potential Problem Report - Illegal Characters

2014-01-29 Thread Randy Clark
No spam warning on this message. Congratulations! On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:42 PM, MikeFry wrote: > On 30 Jan 2014 00:38, Dave Naylor wrote: > > On 29 Jan 2014 Syble Glasscock wrote: > > >> #6706, I have Hays/Hayes > > > >> I received this: > > > >> [6706]The following characters are not usu

Re: [LegacyUG] Potential Problem Report - Illegal Characters

2014-01-29 Thread MikeFry
On 30 Jan 2014 00:38, Dave Naylor wrote: > On 29 Jan 2014 Syble Glasscock wrote: >> #6706, I have Hays/Hayes > >> I received this: > >> [6706]The following characters are not usually found in a name: > !@#$%^&*_ +=|\/;:><~` []{} 0123456789. ^ | What's thi

Re: [LegacyUG] Potential Problem Report - Illegal Characters

2014-01-29 Thread Dave Naylor
On 29 Jan 2014 Syble Glasscock wrote: >  #6706, I have Hays/Hayes > I received this:  > [6706]The following characters are not usually found in a name: !@#$%^&*_ +=|\/;:><~` []{} 0123456789. > Remove any erroneous characters. But you do not have any of those characters in your surname field s

[LegacyUG] Potential Problem Report - Illegal Characters

2014-01-29 Thread Syble Glasscock
# 6714, I have surname as Coffee/Cofey  #6706, I have Hays/Hayes Is there a way to have the two spellings rather than in the aka I received this:  [6714]The following characters are not usually found in a name: !@#$%^&*_ +=|\/;:><~` []{} 0123456789. Remove any erroneous characters. [6706] The fo