This subject is off-topic, and would require a longer post than
acceptable to dispel all the persistent myths. I will create a web
site so I can expand on my initial rant and I won't have to keep
repeating myself. Interested readers can meanwhile google Fair
dealing or read the actual UK law
; ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] UK Copyright
Ron,
The article you have linked to is NOT a definitive statement as to
the application of the law for genealogists, and its claim that it
clarifies the position with regards to the records of public bodies
in the U.K. is false. It clarifies
Roots wasn't literature?
-Original Message-
From: Ron Ferguson ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Fri, Mar 4, 2011 4:54 am
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] UK Copyright
Simon,
Perhaps the use of definitive was a little strong for any aspect of
law.
However, I
Roots does not have Crown Copyright!
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
-Original Message-
From: atlant...@aol.com
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 11:54 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] UK Copyright
Roots wasn't literature?
-Original Message-
From
Apologies for being off-topic for this list, but the question of UK copyright
has been raised many times, and by many Luggers, both on and off list.
Please see
http://www.one-place-studies.org/resources/0007-Copyright-PublicBodiesUK.html
for a definitive statement as to the application of the
Ron,
The article you have linked to is NOT a definitive statement as to
the application of the law for genealogists, and its claim that it
clarifies the position with regards to the records of public bodies
in the U.K. is false. It clarifies SOME copyright questions that
people compiling _ONE
6 matches
Mail list logo
