Re: [LegacyUG] LegacyUG] Direct Line in bold

2012-12-24 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
, Pat Hickin pph...@gmail.com wrote: From: Pat Hickin pph...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] LegacyUG] Direct Line in bold To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Date: Sunday, December 23, 2012, 3:30 PM There is a genealogy of the Springer family (filled with misinformation) that traces the family

Re: [LegacyUG] LegacyUG] Direct Line in bold

2012-12-24 Thread Marli Yoder
From: RICHARD SCHULTHIES fourpa...@verizon.net To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Mon, December 24, 2012 9:34:16 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] LegacyUG] Direct Line in bold I have similar connections through Charlemagne and others. Some of the lines have good documentation because

Re: [LegacyUG] LegacyUG] Direct Line in bold

2012-12-23 Thread Pat Hickin
paula.ryb...@sbcglobal.net* wrote: From: Paula Ryburn paula.ryb...@sbcglobal.net Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] LegacyUG] Direct Line in bold To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Date: Saturday, December 22, 2012, 8:09 AM Do you have your tree on the web? Just curious. Thx. --Paula in Texas

Re: [LegacyUG] LegacyUG] Direct Line in bold

2012-12-23 Thread Pat Hickin
...@msn.com *To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.comhttp://us.mc843.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com *Sent:* Tuesday, December 11, 2012 5:04 PM *Subject:* RE: [LegacyUG] Direct Line in bold Good advice. I go back more than 40 generations in several lines. You do have

RE: [LegacyUG] LegacyUG] Direct Line in bold

2012-12-23 Thread CE WOOD
Latest research shows it's back though Lucy to Ardi. CEFrom: br...@the-lightfoots.com To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] LegacyUG] Direct Line in bold Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:47:23 -0800 I think we can all trace our families back to Adam Eve. I’m just missing a few

Re: [LegacyUG] LegacyUG] Direct Line in bold

2012-12-22 Thread Paula Ryburn
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] LegacyUG] Direct Line in bold Some of mine go back 70 generations, which gets me to 100 BC. --- On Tue, 12/11/12, Richard_S_ rhsconsult...@comcast.net wrote: From: Richard_S_ rhsconsult...@comcast.net Subject: [LegacyUG] LegacyUG] Direct Line in bold To: LegacyUserGroup

Re: [LegacyUG] LegacyUG] Direct Line in bold

2012-12-22 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
YES, half finished in familysearch.org Rich --- On Sat, 12/22/12, Paula Ryburn paula.ryb...@sbcglobal.net wrote: From: Paula Ryburn paula.ryb...@sbcglobal.net Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] LegacyUG] Direct Line in bold To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Date: Saturday, December 22, 2012, 8:09 AM

Re: [LegacyUG] LegacyUG] Direct Line in bold

2012-12-12 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
bold generations going back to 1470 in Europe.     Richard   - Original Message - From: CE WOOD To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 5:04 PM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Direct Line in bold Good advice.  I go back more than 40 generations in several lines.  You

RE: [LegacyUG] LegacyUG] Direct Line in bold

2012-12-11 Thread CE WOOD
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Direct Line in bold Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:15:30 -0700 I have one line that goes back 13 generations and the direct line is still bolded and the relationships still show. Maybe go back and reset them again but highlighting yourself