Try two (2) commas before
Regards
Laurence E Stephenson


------ Original Message ------
From: "magnoliasouth" <magnoliaso...@gmail.com>
To: legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com
Sent: 14/04/2014 7:37:52 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Location merging

>Many, MANY thanks for the suggestions and the "sorry but you'll just
>have to deal with it" answers. I appreciate the sentiments. lol!
>
>Oh and when I said 300, I meant 300 ways of Sumter County. lol! Who
>knew?
>
>The search function doesn't appear to work properly either. To prove
>the problem, I'll do my screen caps again. The short answer is that
>I'll have a location that says Franklin, AL and when I go to replace
>AL with Alabama it says there were 0 replacements, AL was not found.
>REALLY???!!! It's all over the place!
>
>The list that displays the AL example above: http://goo.gl/5TjOsa
>The operators I used to search and replace: http://goo.gl/6eO9ph
>The results: http://goo.gl/JSRf3Y
>
>Oh and I if I remove the comma, it still says 0 replacements. I
>thought maybe that was a problem, but alas, it was not.
>
>Anyway, because you were all so kind as to respond, I have responded
>to each of you below. Hopefully I missed no one. :)
>
>On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Cathy Pinner <genea...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>>
>>  Instead of merging each one to your final choice, you could merge the
>>  ones that are near each other first.
>>  However, with the examples you provide, they'd all be together if
>>  you were sorting left to right instead of right to left - but you
>>  probably have a number of towns included as well.
>
>I do. I saw that as an issue. There really needs to be a csv Location
>merge function. There is no reason not to have one. You could then
>also turn options on and off to match anything between commas. This
>way it wouldn't mess up any entries with towns in them.
>
>I fully expected it to have this funciton and was very surprised it
>didn't exist. I also felt like the replace function would work, but it
>doesn't, as I mentioned above.
>
>On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 6:05 AM, C.G. Ouimet <c.g.oui...@outlook.com>
>wrote:
>>  Yes CSV's for all list outputs would be good ...
>>
>>
>>  C.G. Ouimet
>>  Kingston ON
>
>That's exactly what I was wanting (I agree about the events too). I
>was disappointed to find that a report of my locations required only a
>pdf, but it also forced me into accepting (at the minimum) how many
>individuals each was assigned to. I couldn't care less about that. All
>I want is a report of locations. Anyway, the functionality of csv is
>much better in fixing problems like this than whatever it is that this
>does.
>
>
>On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 7:02 AM, David Newton
><davidnew...@drdavid.plus.com> wrote:
>>  There is a way to tag all the locations containing Sumter but what
>>you
>>  can do with the list after that I do not know.
>>  David
>
>LOL! Yeah, I agree. I like the functionality of the Master Source
>view. You can tag certain sources then hide those not tagged. Then you
>can merge and do whatnot. Now THAT was extremely helpful. I was very
>pleased with how that worked out and it was simple.
>
>I could see something similar here. Tagging everything that says
>Sumter then hiding all the other stuff so I can fix that one area. In
>fact, if it had worked that way, I wouldn't have asked for any help on
>the list.
>
>On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 9:09 AM, singhals <singh...@erols.com> wrote:
>>  To reduce the pain a bit, though, you can select the version
>>  you want, copy the info, then just paste it over the other
>>  source names and then merge dupes. IME, it keeps the detail
>>  on each and saves a lot of rekeying.
>>
>>  Cheryl
>
>I don't know why, because it sounds so simple, but this confuses me.
>Wouldn't merging duplicates keep the details? Oh wait. I think I
>understand what you mean. You mean copy/paste the location name I like
>such as copying , , Sumter County, Georgia and pasting it over Sumter
>Co., GA.
>
>I agree, that's the least painful way and that's what I did day before
>yesterday and it took HOURS. I literally spent 8 hours fixing all my
>locations. The unfortunate thing was that I realized there were a lot
>of individual merges that weren't right, so I had to resort to going
>back to the original file and starting all over again. I tell you, I
>cried real tears. Real!
>
>On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 9:26 AM, David Abernathy
><da...@schmeckabernathy.com> wrote:
>>  Have you edited these entries with errors per the instructions from
>>the Help?
>>
>>  Combining Duplicate Locations
>>
>>  When correcting misspelled place names, you may find that you end up
>>with duplicates within the Master Location List. To remove these
>>duplicates and clean up the list, choose the Combine option. Legacy
>>then goes through the list, combines the duplicates and moves the
>>links.
>>
>>  Thanks,
>>  David C Abernathy
>
>Yes, thank you. In my original message I explained why that wasn't
>working for me. The problem is the 300 same place names and scrolling
>through thousands to go back and forth.
>
>On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Bob Austen <rgaus...@telus.net>
>wrote:
>>  Using Search and Replace might help you in this situation.
>>  Bob A
>
>You are so kind for those instructions and that was what I was hoping
>for most. However the search didn't work for me for some reason. I
>have screen caps above that you can take a look at and see what I
>mean.
>
>Honestly, I thought I was in the twilight zone. Last night I went to
>Findagrave.com and did a search with a name, location and death date
>and it said zero results. I went to Google and had it search
>Findagrave.com, entered the exact same information and it found what I
>entered. lol! I was like "well maybe my computer is just in total love
>with Google and refuses to search any other way." lol! ;)
>
>On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Jay 1FamilyTree
><1familytree....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  I created a cvs spreadsheet and used that externally to group my
>>common
>>  places.
>>  At least then I knew what to look for in the Legacy location listing.
>>  And I have over 5,000 locations...
>
>That's an interesting idea. You don't feel you're duplicating
>information that way?
>
>I would love it if we could export a cvs list of locations, then
>import and merge those. Wouldn't that be ideal?
>
>On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 1:09 AM, magnoliasouth
><magnoliaso...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  I have a horrible list of locations. I understand how to combine
>>  locations, but that's not working for me. It involves way too much
>>  scrolling up and down and all around. Also, the "find" at the top
>>  isn't finding anything. It only looks for the first word which
>>doesn't
>>  help me.
>>
>>  What I need to do is do a search for one word and get a list of all
>>  locations that have that word in its various forms. For example:
>>
>>  Let's say I want to search for Sumter.
>>
>>  I want to get all of the results like this:
>>
>>  Georgia, Sumter
>>  Georgia, Sumter County
>>  Georgia, Sumter Co.
>>  GA, Sumter
>>  GA, Sumter County
>>  USA, GA, Sumter
>>  USA, GA Sumter County
>>  USA, Ga. Sumter County
>>  United States, Georgia, Sumter
>>  Sumter
>>
>>  You see the problem and I use this one because it's my worst
>>  nightmare. Sumter is all over the place and some location entries
>>  don't even have anything else in them.
>>
>>  Now as you can see, when I have 300 locations and they're sorted they
>>  are at the top the middle the end and so on. Scrolling take WAY too
>>  long and that's just not an option. I'd rather not bother if I have
>>to
>>  do it that way.
>>
>>  How can I fix this? Please, tell me there is an easy way?
>>
>>  Many thanks. :)
>>
>>
>>
>>  Legacy User Group guidelines:
>>  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>>  Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>>  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
>>  Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>>  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>>  Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>>  Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree)
>>and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
>>  To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>>
>>
>
>
>
>Legacy User Group guidelines:
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
>Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree)
>and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
>To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Reply via email to