On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 5:57 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > I have no attachment to RPM-style
> > > license tags, though Red Hat finds them marginally useful for some
> > > purposes.
> >
> > What are the purposes for which Red Hat finds the spec license tags
> > useful?
>
> I am still interested i
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 6:15 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 08:07:02PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-09-18 at 20:47 -0400, Richard Fontana wrote:
> > > While the Sun RPC problem *may* have been excised from glibc, just
> > > last year we found an
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 6:34 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Although I don't like the advice I am interested when such license
> notices can be removed. That would make some discussions about whether
> or not to include extra tags/expressions easier (if it is possible to
> just remove the notice, then
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 6:57 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 08:07:02PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-09-18 at 20:47 -0400, Richard Fontana wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 11:37 AM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > > Likewise for valgrind we have e
Dne 17. 01. 24 v 23:57 Mark Wielaard napsal(a):
What are the purposes for which Red Hat finds the spec license tags
useful?
I am still interested in this
History reason. I guess.
I recall that 15 years ago, few maintainers I spoke with were proud of design of spec files that everything is in
Dne 18. 01. 24 v 0:01 Richard Fontana napsal(a):
srpm. Kind of like debian/copyright. The advantage is that you then
don't have to find some exact (or inexact) match with specific
identifiers and that it can be shared with upstream and/or other
I would support this idea if we were starting from
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 08:07:02PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-09-18 at 20:47 -0400, Richard Fontana wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 11:37 AM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > Likewise for valgrind we have examples of the above. For example the
> > > dhat tool which have a
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 08:07:02PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-09-18 at 20:47 -0400, Richard Fontana wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 11:37 AM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > Something similar is done in glibc. For example several files I
> > > contributed to were adapted
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 08:07:02PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-09-18 at 20:47 -0400, Richard Fontana wrote:
> > While the Sun RPC problem *may* have been excised from glibc, just
> > last year we found another license in glibc (and at least one other
> > package), this t
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 5:47 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Going to chop this discssion into smaller parts.
>
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 08:07:02PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-09-18 at 20:47 -0400, Richard Fontana wrote:
> > > I think anyone should be free to propose
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 08:07:02PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > Is this really a problem? Could you show an example where an upstream
> > > or package maintainer stated in the license tag that the effective
> > > license was say "GPLv3+", but it would have been more "correct" to s
Hi Richard,
Going to chop this discssion into smaller parts.
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 08:07:02PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-09-18 at 20:47 -0400, Richard Fontana wrote:
> > I think anyone should be free to propose a new umbrella identifier (in
> > SPDX expression format) that would
Hi Jilayne,
On Sat, 2023-11-25 at 01:49 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 01:18:22PM -0500, Richard Fontana wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:36 AM Mark Wielaard
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2023-11-20 at 09:41 -0500, Richard Fontana wrote:
> >
> > > > You could propose this
13 matches
Mail list logo
