[Fedora-legal-list] Re: IBM non-free patent notice (Was: Re: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition)

2024-01-18 Thread Dan Horák
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 21:58:34 -0500 Richard Fontana wrote: > On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 6:15 PM Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > > Hi Richard, > > > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 08:07:02PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > On Mon, 2023-09-18 at 20:47 -0400, Richard Fontana wrote: > > > > While the Sun RPC pr

[Fedora-legal-list] Re: Can I package linapple and ship it in Fedora?

2023-12-22 Thread Dan Horák
On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 10:35:26 -0500 Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 9:38 AM Dan Horák wrote: > > > > On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 09:13:34 -0500 > > Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 9:06 AM Link Dupont wrote: > > > > > &g

[Fedora-legal-list] Re: Can I package linapple and ship it in Fedora?

2023-12-22 Thread Dan Horák
On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 09:13:34 -0500 Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 9:06 AM Link Dupont wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I've created a package[1] for linapple[2], an Apple ][ family emulator. I'm > > trying to understand whether it can be included in Fedora or not. I've read > > the l

[Fedora-legal-list] Re: Open CASCADE Technology licence for versions 6.7.0 and later.

2020-04-14 Thread Dan Horák
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 09:28:55 +0200 Peter Lemenkov wrote: > вт, 14 апр. 2020 г. в 09:08, Przemo Firszt : > > > > Thank you very much for the clarification! I need to find it now :-) > > I think we have OCE (OPENCASCADE Community Edition) in the repos, > > but not OCCT. > > I think we have both. L

[Fedora-legal-list] Re: Adding package with binary firmware to repo

2018-07-11 Thread Dan Horák
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 19:05:03 +0800 Vascom wrote: > Hi. > I am want add to repo package openhantek > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558362 > It is oscilloscopes GUI. > This application contain binary firmware for some models of USB > oscilloscopes. This firmware must be loaded to osc

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Is MSR-LA considered as free?

2014-08-27 Thread Dan Horák
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 13:45:24 +0800 Christopher Meng wrote: > Hi, > > I'm packaging z3 prover[1] from Microsfot Research and its license is > MSR-LA[2]. > > As I never hear of that before, I'd like to request help from list to > see if it's acceptable for Fedora packaging. IMO non-free, it cont

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] OpenCASCADE now under LGPL v2.1 plus exception

2013-12-30 Thread Dan Horák
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 12:46:21 -0500 Tom Callaway wrote: > On 12/25/2013 09:34 PM, Eric Smith wrote: > > I'd like to package OpenCASCADE, which was formerly under a non-free > > license, but starting from version 6.7.0 it has been relicensed > > under LGPL v2.1 plus an exception. The full license

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] This code may be freely used and modified for any purpose

2013-04-23 Thread Dan Horák
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:17:53 +0200 Miro Hrončok wrote: > HI, > how can I use this in a package? > > Copyright 2001, softSurfer (www.softsurfer.com) > This code may be freely used and modified for any purpose > providing that this copyright notice is included with it. > SoftSu

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] SALOME license

2013-01-10 Thread Dan Horák
Mario Ceresa píše v Čt 10. 01. 2013 v 12:54 +0100: > Hello everybody, > I would like to package Salome Meca, a cad/simulation software. The > webpage says it's LGPL: > http://www.salome-platform.org/downloads/license > > but Richard noticed that you have to register in order to download the > so

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] iozone license

2012-01-18 Thread Dan Horák
Jiri Kastner píše v St 18. 01. 2012 v 07:54 +: > from iozone.c: > > THISVERSION, > MODE, > " ", > " Original Author: William Norcott (wnorc...@us.oracle.com)", > " 4 Dunlap Drive", > " Nashua, NH 03060", > " ", > " Enhancements: Don Capps

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] mixing (A)GPLv3+ and GPLv2 sources in a python project

2010-10-22 Thread Dan Horák
Tom "spot" Callaway píše v Pá 22. 10. 2010 v 12:06 -0400: > On 10/22/2010 11:42 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm doing a review for OpenERP [1] client [2] and server [3], all > > written in Python. > > > > The client in version 6.

[Fedora-legal-list] mixing (A)GPLv3+ and GPLv2 sources in a python project

2010-10-22 Thread Dan Horák
Hi, I'm doing a review for OpenERP [1] client [2] and server [3], all written in Python. The client in version 6.0 uses AGPLv3+ for most of its files and GPLv2 for few of them (imported 3rd party library in bin/SpiffGtkWidgets/Calendar). Is such mixing possible? The client in version 5.x uses GP