Awesome, thank you!
пт, 2 авг. 2024 г., 21:38 Miroslav Suchý :
> Dne 02. 08. 24 v 9:07 odp. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
> >
> >
> > I will love to see more usage of this tag, but I believe the
> documentatin has to be updated first. PR for packaging
> > guidelines and legal doc is welcome.
> >
> He
Thanks for the answer! I've got it now.
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 12:33 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 01. 08. 24 v 12:28 odp. Peter Lemenkov napsal(a):
> > Hello!
> > I stumbled upon the following situation. I am packaging a library
> > under MIT license. Howeve
questions.
1. If a tarball has a differently licensed file which is not going to
a final RPM should I still list its license in a spec's %license
field?
2. Does it change anything if this file wasn't used at all during RPM
build process?
--
With best regards, Pete
fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrast
ora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https
-
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
legal mailing list -- legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guide
egal mailing list -- legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to legal-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://li
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VV27RYGVQ7ZW3F7QG
oftware patents are valid anywhere but USA
and South Korea, so mentioning Philippines and Malaysia was a surprise
to me.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
legal mailing list -- legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an em
No other AAC implementations (regardless of copyright license) are
> permitted in Fedora at this time.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tom Callaway
> ___
> devel mailing list -- de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le.
Hello All!
Does anybody know if twolame (mp2 encoder) is OK for Fedora?
* http://www.twolame.org
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPEG-1_Audio_Layer_II
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
legal mailing list -- legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
dora
> now?
Yes! Nicolas Chauvet started importing liba52 already.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433758
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
legal mailing list -- legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
it under the terms of the DO WHATEVER PUBLIC LICENSE
>>
>> Software originally created by Justin Lloyd @ http://otakunozoku.com/
>
> Source: https://github.com/rednex/rgbds/blob/master/LICENSE
>
> Thank you
> Sanqui
> ___
> legal mail
ra?
* If yes, can it be used in GPLv2+ licensed application?
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
legal mailing list
legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
ks for your help.
Sounds like a CC0 (Creative Commons Zero 1.0 Universal) or Public Domain
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
legal mailing list
legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
someone please make a legal review of the current situation? If
MIT isn't ok then I can relicense it under a different license -
that's not an issue.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
legal mailing list
legal@lists.fedoraproject
this - fully automated "early prevention program" to
detect some license incompatibilities (or impossibility to detect
licensing terms)/.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
legal mailing list
legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
I personally advise you to stay away from both of them.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
legal mailing list
legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
/ilbc-0.0.2.tar.gz
* http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/mediastreamer/SPECS/ilbc.spec
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
legal mailing list
legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
claimed that "the
legal issues may never have been resolved" I think it's time to
reconsider whether we can ship it or not.
* http://stardict.sourceforge.net/
* http://code.google.com/p/stardict-3/
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
leg
bute to the evolution of the product
and many other people can benefit from your modifications.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
legal mailing list
legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
the package.
>> without the right to modify I doubt this will be excepted.
I don't think that we need a modification rights for contents.
(especially for such hard-to-modify as PDF files). It's a
documentation/manuals and modifying it seems
FE-LEGAL blocker to all the reviews in
question (to erlang-skerl and possibly to some others) , and will
unblock them as soon as I will get confirmation from upstream. I will
not add FE-LEGAL to erlang-bitcask since the issue was already
resolved.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
oject? Would removing support for these formats
> make it possible to include a stripped version of mplayer in the Fedora
> repositories?
Removal of "patented" codecs from mplayer renders it almost completely
useless. I'd rather to stay with rpmfusion package.
--
st regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
legal mailing list
legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
25 matches
Mail list logo
