Russ Nelson writes:
> > or since the original imagery is available from somewhere as PD just
> > bypassing any doubt and go upstream.
>
> Haven't been able to find an alternative source. Suggestions
> appreciated.
http://seamless.usgs.gov/website/seamless/viewer.htm
-Jukka-
_
Russ Nelson writes:
>
> Is it okay to trace into OSM from the public-domain USGS Topographic
> and DOQ (Digital Orthographic Quads) aerial imagery? I think the
> answer there should be clearly "yes".
>
Why not to ask directly from USGS about this and what they mean with their text
"A coop
On Feb 11, 2009, at 3:27 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> you're basically asking whether a PD source retains its PD status
> even if channeled through a number of probably non-PD services.
>
> This is no different from the question: If the OSM database is
> licensed
> "X", and if I put some data in
On Feb 11, 2009, at 5:25 PM, Andy Allan wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Russ Nelson
> wrote:
>> Is it okay to trace into OSM from the public-domain USGS Topographic
>> and DOQ (Digital Orthographic Quads) aerial imagery? I think the
>> answer there should be clearly "yes".
>
> IS ye
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Russ Nelson wrote:
> Is it okay to trace into OSM from the public-domain USGS Topographic
> and DOQ (Digital Orthographic Quads) aerial imagery? I think the
> answer there should be clearly "yes".
IS yes, or SHOULD BE yes? I would suggest either getting confirmat
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> A co-worker of yours, CloudMade's very own Andy Allan, had this to say
> about the topic:
Just as well that none of us are lawyers then, eh? :-)
Cheers,
Andy
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-ta
