Re: [OSM-legal-talk] ODbL: Where do we stand regarding collective/derivative databases

2009-07-28 Thread Matt Amos
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Dave Stubbs wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Matt Amos wrote: >> > LWG cannot entirely resolve these questions, as they need open >> > discussion and community consensus (which we obviously can't provide >> > on our own

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] ODbL: Where do we stand regarding collective/derivative databases

2009-07-28 Thread Dave Stubbs
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > Matt Amos wrote: > > LWG cannot entirely resolve these questions, as they need open > > discussion and community consensus (which we obviously can't provide > > on our own). even then, final interpretation is up to the courts. > > Of