On 18 Aug 2009, at 11:35, Dave Stubbs wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Peter Miller > wrote:
>>
>> On 18 Aug 2009, at 10:30, Tom Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> On 18/08/09 09:27, Peter Miller wrote:
>>>
Andy mentions that copyright violation needs to go to the Data
Working
Group. W
On 18/08/09 11:18, Peter Miller wrote:
>
> On 18 Aug 2009, at 10:30, Tom Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 18/08/09 09:27, Peter Miller wrote:
>>
>>> Andy mentions that copyright violation needs to go to the Data
>>> Working
>>> Group. Why? Sure the foundation needs a log of action of copyright
>>> violations,
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Peter Miller wrote:
>
> On 18 Aug 2009, at 10:30, Tom Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 18/08/09 09:27, Peter Miller wrote:
>>
>>> Andy mentions that copyright violation needs to go to the Data
>>> Working
>>> Group. Why? Sure the foundation needs a log of action of copyright
On 18 Aug 2009, at 10:30, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 18/08/09 09:27, Peter Miller wrote:
>
>> Andy mentions that copyright violation needs to go to the Data
>> Working
>> Group. Why? Sure the foundation needs a log of action of copyright
>> violations, but I don't see why the requested reverts, or
On 18/08/09 09:27, Peter Miller wrote:
> Andy mentions that copyright violation needs to go to the Data Working
> Group. Why? Sure the foundation needs a log of action of copyright
> violations, but I don't see why the requested reverts, or 'plastering
> over the cracks' can't be put onto a public
On 17 Aug 2009, at 19:13, SteveC wrote:
>
> On 17 Aug 2009, at 11:13, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>> 2009/8/17 Peter Miller :
>>> You may wish to set up a Belgium equivalent for this page to act
>>> as a
>>> record of such reverts. As you can see we have been having some
>>> problems of our ow