Gervase Markham gerv-gm...@... writes:
From the Contributor Terms:
You hereby grant to OSMF and any party that receives Your Contents a
worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive, perpetual, irrevocable license
to do any act that is restricted by copyright over anything within the
Contents, whether
2010/1/12 Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com:
That is an interesting point.
If map data is covered by copyright, then without copyright assignment
the ability of the OSMF to enforce share-alike is weakened.
As I've observed OSMF cannot enforce share-alike under the existing
contributor terms because
Rufus
Awesome this is happening, but the name is wrong. We don't need a OKFNODCAL,
and even the ODbL can be shortened, we need something that they all share and
then we also need a NC version. I suggest it's just something like OD for
OpenDatabase in place of CC, so that you get OD-BY-SA as
Hi,
SteveC wrote:
then we also need a NC version.
NC licenses are not compatible with OKFN's own definition of Open
Knowledge, Paragraph 8:
(quote)
8. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor
The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the work in a
specific field of
On Jan 12, 2010, at 8:58 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
SteveC wrote:
then we also need a NC version.
NC licenses are not compatible with OKFN's own definition of Open
Knowledge, Paragraph 8:
(quote)
8. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor
The license must not restrict
You're right we should just give up.
Yours c.
Steve
On Jan 12, 2010, at 10:53 AM, jonathon wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 13:35, SteveC wrote:
we also need a NC version.
Need?
Problem # 1: Define Non-Commercial Usage.
Problem # 2: Define Commercial Usage.
Problem # 3: What
