On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Tim,
OSM is not essentially anything at its core. It is different things to
different people.
I'm talking about the sentence that defines OSM at the top of our Wiki
page, which in all likelihood has been there in this
Erik,
Erik Johansson wrote:
Obviously a lot of people think Openstreetmap is more than just a
collection of coordinates in a db. I think you try to redefine it in a
way that supports your PD argument.
Firstly, I am not making a PD argument but an ODbL argument here.
Secondly, I'm not
Frederik Ramm wrote:
/ OSM is not essentially anything at its core. It is different things
to // different people.
/
I'm talking about the sentence that defines OSM at the top of our Wiki
page, which in all likelihood has been there in this form when most of
us signed up.
As if that
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Albertas Agejevas a...@pov.lt wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:50:50AM +0200, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
wrote:
2010/4/22 Dirk-Lüder Kreie osm-l...@deelkar.net
Am 22.04.2010 02:51, schrieb andrzej zaborowski:
No other data gatherer in the world has
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:47:47 +0200, Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com
wrote:
If ODBL existed in the same variants as CC does, this would be easier.
I support CC very strongly, but I don't recommend licence variants. They
make things even more confusing and incompatible.
OSM can be viewed as
