Re: [OSM-legal-talk] decision removing data

2010-08-06 Thread Ed Avis
Anthony writes: >I've pretty much stopped uploading my maps to OSM precisely because of >this switch to ODbL. There isn't a switch to ODbL. Just a (not very practical IMHO) plan to do so at some point in the future, and a (not very convincing) reason why it is necessary. For the time being, we

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] decision removing data

2010-08-06 Thread Jukka Rahkonen
80n <80n...@...> writes: > There are many things that meet the almost trivial threshold that legally constitutes creativity. Road classification, land use, abstraction, generalization, selectivity, arbitrary tagging, arrangement, smoothness, routes, desire paths, boundary approximation, building

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] decision removing data

2010-08-06 Thread 80n
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Jukka Rahkonen wrote: > 80n <80n...@...> writes: > > > > There are many things that meet the almost trivial threshold that legally > constitutes creativity. Road classification, land use, abstraction, > generalization, selectivity, arbitrary tagging, arrangement, s

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] decision removing data

2010-08-06 Thread 80n
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Francis Davey wrote: > On 5 August 2010 22:26, 80n <80n...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Francis > > Indeed. Let's start getting specific. The threshold in the US is very > low > > - which incidentally is where this "you can't copyright facts" stuff > > originated.

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] decision removing data

2010-08-06 Thread Jukka Rahkonen
80n <80n...@...> writes: > > So, without your best endeavours, would you agree that these contributors would naturally introduce some creativeness?  If you have to expend effort to remove creativity then you have made a pretty good case for the existence of creativity.  Thank you for your testimo