Andy Allan writes:
> Never mind what Richard says, there's also some other points
> 1) You can't actually put anything into the public domain in most
> jurisdictions. The best you can do yourself is use a special license,
> such as CC0, which achieves similar results, but strictly isn't the
>
Frederik Ramm writes:
> Russ Nelson wrote:
> > I'm running a BOF at OSCON[1] on Wednesday night July 21st at 7PM, with
> > the declared purpose of writing an Open Source Definition for Open
> > Data. Safe enough to say that the OSD has been quite successful in
> > laying out a set of criteria
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Rob Myers wrote:
> On 08/07/2010 03:35 PM, Anthony wrote:
>>
>> I don't really see how there's an argument. If photoshop offers a
>> plugin that lets you draw a line with a certain thickness, a certain
>> color, and a label on it, and you use that photoshop plugin
On 08/07/2010 03:35 PM, Anthony wrote:
I don't really see how there's an argument. If photoshop offers a
plugin that lets you draw a line with a certain thickness, a certain
color, and a label on it, and you use that photoshop plugin to make a
map, you've got a copyrighted work, and that copyri
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Jukka Rahkonen
wrote:
> I have been leading a team of digitizers tracing features from aerial images.
> I
> was doing everything I could to minimize the creative or artistic part of
> their
> work.
Good luck with that. In any case, not all OSM ways are traced fr
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Ed Avis wrote:
> Anthony writes:
>
>>I've pretty much stopped uploading my maps to OSM precisely because of
>>this switch to ODbL.
>
> There isn't a switch to ODbL. Just a (not very practical IMHO) plan to do so
> at some point in the future, and a (not very convi
