Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata amp; the new license

2010-10-02 Thread Ed Avis
andrzej zaborowski balr...@... writes: Multiple times on these lists people have been advised to vote with their data. Since most contributors were not asked about the relicense process, then, if they just agree to relicense their data and then leave the project, OSMF will never know. Yes, it

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Legal or not? user srpskicrv and source = TOPO 25 VGI BEOGRAD

2010-10-02 Thread Valent Turkovic
On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:02:16 +, Ed Avis wrote: Or does srpskicrv mean that the mapping agency of Serbia is the only entity that claims copyright, and further that it has released the maps to the public domain? Here is his answer: Okay, even if I dont have time (this is the

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata the new license

2010-10-02 Thread SteveC
On Oct 1, 2010, at 6:54 PM, Anthony wrote: Where are you getting this information, anyway? I'd like to ask you kindly to stop lying about me. I have never been banned from Wikipedia. So you're not Anthony DiPierro then? Or are you merely playing with semantics that you weren't kicked, but

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata the new license

2010-10-02 Thread SteveC
On Oct 2, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Anthony wrote: On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 6:54 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote a bunch of stuff. I'd like to further ask that you do not repost private messages on a public message board. Your behavior is unacceptable, and I'm not going to respond to it with