Before this thread goes any further,Yes, a cock-up I believe, possibly mine.
The un-highlighted text should be the same as CT 1.0. Thank you fx99 for
pointing it out. Will investigate.
Mike
At 03:39 PM 3/12/2010, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>David Groom wrote:
>> If the OSMF board wish to move
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Renaud MICHEL wrote:
> Le dimanche 05 décembre 2010 à 11:49, Mike Dupont a écrit :
>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Renaud MICHEL
> wrote:
>> > Is it OK to use bing imagery when you have accepted the contributors
>> > term,
>>
>> How are they connected? please
Le dimanche 05 décembre 2010 à 11:49, Mike Dupont a écrit :
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Renaud MICHEL
wrote:
> > Is it OK to use bing imagery when you have accepted the contributors
> > term,
>
> How are they connected? please explain.
Because of the terms of the CT, I don't know if trac
Renaud MICHEL wrote:
Is it OK to use bing imagery when you have accepted the contributors term,
as I have explicitly accepted them (version 1.0), and every mapper who
registered after March 2010 (correct?) are also contributing under CT 1.0?
I also did so and I *want* my contributions to get OD
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Renaud MICHEL wrote:
> Is it OK to use bing imagery when you have accepted the contributors term,
How are they connected? please explain.
thanks,
mike
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://list
Le dimanche 05 décembre 2010 à 11:16, Manuel Reimer a écrit :
> is it secure to use Bing? Any license risks? Could Microsoft, at some
> day, just force us to remove everything with "source=Bing" on it? Am I
> forced to have this "source" tag there? Should stuff, taken from Bing,
> be verified via
Hello,
is it secure to use Bing? Any license risks? Could Microsoft, at some day, just
force us to remove everything with "source=Bing" on it? Am I forced to have this
"source" tag there? Should stuff, taken from Bing, be verified via GPS track at
some time to get the data secure?
One risk,
