Francis Davey fjmd1a@... writes:
But it's possible
that the 'contents', which are covered by the DbCL rather than the ODbL, might
be something meaningful.
Yes, indeed. And who knows?
If I understand you rightly, you're saying that the 'contents' referred to here
is not meant to be something
2011/5/8 Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com:
If I understand you rightly, you're saying that the 'contents' referred to
here
is not meant to be something meaningful in the context of OSM, but rather a
catch-all term for whatever a court might find to be 'database contents' in
the
future.
H,
