On 26 June 2011 17:22, Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> can I still expect a contructive reply to my email answering your question
> about my concerns, or should I simply hit the „decline“ button?
>
Hi Olaf,
Sorry I have not had time to think through your suggestions fully.
Plannin
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Anthony wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> > My suspicion is that a system where each user can choose a different
> licence (or set of licences) for their contribution would either fall apart
> (as some entities would need to be rol
Legal issues aside, map data (and ongoing versions of map data edited by
different individuals) is intertwined. Which is to say that people build on
the contributions of others both in elements that co-exist and elements that
are direct descendants of each other.
In the end, it's like a book w
Hi,
Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer wrote:
can I still expect a contructive reply to my email answering your question
about my concerns, or should I simply hit the „decline“ button?
In your opinion, what would be the legal consequence of changing the
contributor terms at this point?
For example, if
Hi Grant,
can I still expect a contructive reply to my email answering your question
about my concerns, or should I simply hit the „decline“ button?
Olaf
[Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer, 17.06.2011, 14:53]:
> Hi Grant,
>
> > Please list the "problematic language" you are referring to... Your
> > emai
Hi all,
I wanted to create a way for individual users to relicense their data
under difference licenses. Since OSM and derivatives are OAuth capable,
it is possible to authenticate a user and get them to agree to a
license. This can be stored in a machine readable format. I hope this
will be
