If you cc0 your work anyone can relicence it.
So do that and then contribute it under the cts and there isn't a problem.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 07:49:18AM +0200, Michael Kugelmann wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 04:45:41PM -0400, Anthony wrote:
So what's the problem? You don't want to grant OSMF the right to
relicense. OSMF doesn't want your edits without the right to
relicense them.
Why do you want to force your edits, *which they don't want*, upon them?
I have a problem
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 05:06:48PM -0400, Anthony wrote:
Could they do things another way? Sure, they could. But they've
chosen not to. If you don't like it, don't contribute.
I have contributed a lot for nearly 3 years and now i am blocked out
so i am not contributing anymore and i ceased
On 15/08/11 22:16, Florian Lohoff wrote:
I have contributed a lot for nearly 3 years and now i am blocked out
so i am not contributing anymore and i ceased all my OSM work already.
Since your contributions are PD and therefore CT compatible I don't
understand what the problem is.
- Rob.
Nobody has claimed that everything leading up to the license changed was
handled perfectly, with hindsight I would suspect that a couple of
things would
have been handled differently by everybody involved.
But I have not seen anything that would indicate that the outcome of
any such better