On 04/07/2012 07:14 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 04/07/2012 07:50 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
It looks like with the release of CC 4.0 there may be two share-alike
licenses suitable for data with different copyleft provisions. CC with a
stronger copyleft and ODbL with a weaker one that allows pro
Hi,
On 04/07/2012 07:50 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
It looks like with the release of CC 4.0 there may be two share-alike
licenses suitable for data with different copyleft provisions. CC with a
stronger copyleft and ODbL with a weaker one that allows produced works
under a non-free license.
I don'
> From: Rob Myers [mailto:r...@robmyers.org]
> Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2012 10:08 AM
> To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Creative-Commons 4.0 (first draft)
>
> On 04/04/2012 01:33 PM, Ed Avis wrote:
> > I guess the number 1 requirement for CC4, from an OSM point of
On 04/04/2012 01:33 PM, Ed Avis wrote:
I guess the number 1 requirement for CC4, from an OSM point of view,
is that it be interoperable with the ODbL.
I recommend that people define "compatible" and "interoperable"
thoroughly when discussing them, as they can mean different things in
differen
Hi again,
The inevitable data cleaning comes closer and closer, therefore I want to rise
the issue again before it's too late (with the new knowledge I got from Simon's
answers).
In short, I used old database objects (which were imports from sources
incompatible with CT & ODBL) to enter entire
