Richard wrote:
...Given people's constraints on time and the community's (understandable)
desire for the redaction to get underway asap...
I've seen no such demonstration of desire. The only thing we real mappers
are discussing is anxiety over exactly what will happen and when, and the
huge
[followups set to legal-talk, but you may want to adjust to talk-us if
focusing on LA etc.]
On 21/06/2012 17:57, Alan Mintz wrote:
Richard wrote:
...Given people's constraints on time and the community's
(understandable) desire for the redaction to get underway asap...
I've seen no such
Am 21.06.2012 19:35, schrieb Richard Fairhurst:
The huge amount of data is globally not that huge. It is 1.2% of
nodes (or so odbl.poole.ch tells me,
Actually in real life the damage to nodes is substantially less. On the
one hand I don't respect the V0 rule, on the other hand and more
On 22 June 2012 04:28, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
Actually in real life the damage to nodes is substantially less
...
more importantly,
0.53% points (so not quite half of the 1.2%) of the tainted nodes are from
imports, that, should we so wish, could be reimported (on the case of
