On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Apollinaris Schöll wrote:
> They can claim what they want. Even if you sign such a contract it is not
> valid. It's called employer and not slave driver. No court will enforce such
> a contract.
Mr Schöll,
I have hear otherwise, first of all if you sign a contact
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Mike Dupont <
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
> > If someone is unable to sign the CTs because they don't hold copyright
> over
> > their contributions then they'd be unable to legally contribute to OSM
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
> If someone is unable to sign the CTs because they don't hold copyright over
> their contributions then they'd be unable to legally contribute to OSM or
> any open mapping project regardless of the CTs.
>
> If someone is not working in a GIS fie
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> even recent discussions about ODBl compatibility with Wikipedia
> problems shows that there can be problems or complications
> with ODBL only licensed data.
+1
This is what has been concerning me for a while.
--
James Michael DuPont
Member
On 08/10/2012 07:25 AM, Mike Dupont wrote:
Also since we are on the topic, I think that many people who are in
the USA cannot legally sign the CT anyway because the would have to
ask the employeer for permission. If you have signed a NDA you might
be affected, some companies claim all employees
Hi,
On 08/10/2012 10:09 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
The ODbL has a clause softening that rule (4.7. b "parallel
distribution"), which essentially says that you can distribute
DRM-encumbered databases if you offer a non-DRM alternative that is "at
least as accessible as the non-restricted" version.
Hi,
On 08/09/2012 11:54 PM, Mike Dupont wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Phil! Gold wrote:
CC-BY-SA is similar
in broad terms (you must license the mixed database to the user under
CC-BY-SA), but lacks the details more specific to datasets, like the
reasonable-format requirement.
Can
> From: Mike Dupont [mailto:jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com]
> Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Please, consider that more people want to
> mark even their future ODBl OSM contributions as CC-BY-SA compatible
>
> Also since we are on the topic, I think that many people who are in the
> USA cannot lega
