Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Review of IndianaMap as potential datasource

2014-04-19 Thread Mike Dupont
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote: Well no, Mike, I don't think so. What rights a publisher grants to Wikipedia has nothing to do with what rights a publisher grants to OpenStreetMap. Wikipedia has no ownership interest in OpenStreetMap, nor vice-versa.

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Review of IndianaMap as potential datasource

2014-04-19 Thread Stephan Knauss
If the data is creative commons we can't use it. We can't neither fulfill the attribution nor is it compatible with the contributor terms which allows changing the license. Stephan On April 19, 2014 5:19:54 PM CEST, Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Review of IndianaMap as potential datasource

2014-04-19 Thread Mike Dupont
Oh i almost forgot. Well look, they could use the otrs for marking it as public domain. I am sure you can modify the otrs text to include a special text for osm as well. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates so just add in the osm text as well as the creative commons. make it

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Review of IndianaMap as potential datasource

2014-04-19 Thread Paul Norman
If they want to release it under public domain they should just stick a CC0 or PDDL license on it. This would be far simpler than trying to figure out how a grant of rights to a third-party organization affects us, and would allow the use of the data by anyone, including Wikipedia, without any