Am 24.07.2014 23:03, schrieb Alex Barth:
...
> Taking a step back, is the above use case not one we'd like to support
> without triggering share alike? I'm directing my question to everyone,
> not just Paul who's taken the time to review my example above.
IMHO the example is slightly flawed as t
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Alex Barth wrote:
> Taking a step back, is the above use case not one we'd like to support
> without triggering share alike? I'm directing my question to everyone, not
> just Paul who's taken the time to review my example above.
>
Thanks for taking the time to br
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/07/14 04:38 PM, Jake Wasserman wrote:
>
> I agree that geocoded private data must be allowed to stay
> private.
The ODbL goes to great lengths to explain that it only covers publicly
released data.
> At a minimum, we need to find a way to say
