On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Simon Poole wrote:
> If you apply this to your above example, the addresses would be subject
> to SA (however no further information), and while potentially one could
> infer that these are likely the addresses of the store locations, no
> further information wou
> Let's not kid ourselves here. The overwhelming number of commercial OSM
users are not driven by a motivation to help us, but by a motivation to
save money (or perhaps a motivation to escape a monopolist's clutch but
that boils down to the same).
Frederik, saving money is not the point, it's all
On 7/10/2014 7:52 PM, Alex Barth wrote:
Please review:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Geocoding_-_Guideline
The next step is probably to update this page to represent what there is
consensus on out of the discussions and remove what there isn't
consensus on. Anyone want
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Again and again we hear, make it easier for people to geocode their
> proprietary databases and OSM can only benefit from it because everyone
> who saves $$ using OSM somehow magically "helps" OSM. I'm not convinced
> of that.
>
One could
