Hello
A few days ago I commented
But what discussion on legal-talk does not provide is a mechanism for
ascertaining a
representative community opinion on the spirit of the license; nor a
legally qualified opinion on
interpretation options; nor a governance mechanism for resolving the
proposal
Am 03.08.2014 16:16, schrieb Mikel Maron:
...
If it is the understanding of the OSM Foundation, that the Legal Working
Group in some ways functions like a Court, then there are several issues
to raise about the separation of concerns, checks and balances if you
will, in this process as
Admin note: nominally I'm administrator of the legal-talk@ list. In practice
the only international OSM list to ever have been announced as moderated
is talk@, and I think locally talk-us@ may be moderated as well. Merely
administered is a much more light-touch approach and generally works well
