Tom,
Licenses like CC and ODbL can only apply to copyrighted material, which
must generally be a specific creative expression in a fixed medium. You
can't copyright facts, nor opinions.
Assuming you don't have some crazy natural language processing workflow in
mind, you'll only be using the
I believe that in this specific case, the wikipedia article should have
proper sources on the borders (which should be public domain).
michal
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 04:15:50PM +0200, Tom Gregorovic wrote:
Dear all,
I just want to ask here, if it is legal and does not violate the OSM
license
