2014-11-02 23:11 GMT+01:00 Alex Barth :
> We have no significant third party ODbL data releases due to OSM share
> alike to show for
Actually the Italian Government has designed their open data license (IODL)
to be compatible with OdbL:
http://www.dati.gov.it/content/italian-open-data-license-d
2014-11-03 0:17 GMT+01:00 Alex Barth :
> 2014-10-29 20:56 GMT+01:00 Alex Barth :
>>
>>> Updated:
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Open_Data_License%2FGeocoding_-_Guideline&diff=1102233&oldid=1076215
>>>
>>>
>> wouldn't it make more sense to come to a conclusion here before updat
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> my bad, sorry for the confusion, my comment was referring to the following
> edit, which was 4 minutes later:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Open_Data_License/Geocoding_-_Guideline&diff=next&oldid=1102233
>
Got i
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Rob Myers wrote:
> > We have no significant third party ODbL data releases due to OSM
> > share alike to show for,
>
> Then clearly OMS should have stuck with BY-SA for the database, as
> that did gain third party data releases.
Did it? I'm not sure what point yo
2014-11-03 14:43 GMT+01:00 Alex Barth :
> Got it, yes. Databases of items of Produced Work aren't Derivative
> Databases per 4.5b.
>
there is no indication in the ODbL that using a database of addresses and
an OSM db to create a database of coordinates has something to do with a
"produced work"
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:09 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> We have no significant third party ODbL data releases due to OSM share
>> alike to show for
>
>
>
> Actually the Italian Government has designed their open data license
> (IODL) to be compatible with OdbL:
> http://www.dati.gov.it/conte
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> where in one of the first paragraphs there is this unproven claim:
>
> "
>
> Geocoding Results are a Produced Work by the definition of the ODbL
> (section 1.):
>
> “Produced Work” – a work (such as an image, audiovisual material, text,
2014-11-03 15:05 GMT+01:00 Alex Barth :
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <
> dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> where in one of the first paragraphs there is this unproven claim:
>>
>> "
>>
>> Geocoding Results are a Produced Work by the definition of the ODbL
>> (section 1.)
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> Let's presume we all followed this reading, then when would something
> actually fall under the definition of "derivative" database? Why would we
> still be writing to legal talk instead of using the whole OSM db as a
> produced work -
